arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2003.04481

Crowd-MECS: A Novel Crowdsourcing Framework for Mobile Edge Caching and Sharing

Changkun Jiang·Lin Gao·Tong Wang·Yufei Jiang·Jianqiang Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Crowdsourced mobile edge caching and sharing (Crowd-MECS) is emerging as a promising content delivery paradigm by employing a large crowd of existing edge devices (EDs) to cache and share popular contents. The successful technology adoption of Crowd-MECS relies on a comprehensive understanding of the complicated economic interactions and strategic decision-making of different stakeholders. In this paper, we focus on studying the economic and strategic interactions between one content provider (CP) and a large crowd of EDs, where the EDs can decide whether to cache and share contents for the CP, and the CP can decide to share a certain revenue with EDs as the incentive of caching and sharing contents. We formulate such an interaction as a two-stage Stackelberg game. In Stage I, the CP aims to maximize its own profit by deciding the ratio of revenue shared with EDs. In Stage II, EDs aim to maximize their own payoffs by choosing to be agents who cache and share contents, and meanwhile gain a certain revenue from the CP, or requesters who do not cache but request contents in the on-demand fashion. We first analyze the EDs' best responses and prove the existence and uniqueness of the equilibrium in Stage II by using the non-atomic game theory. Then, we identify the piece-wise structure and the unimodal feature of the CP's profit function, based on which we design a tailored low-complexity one-dimensional search algorithm to achieve the optimal revenue sharing ratio for the CP in Stage I. Simulation results show that both the CP's profit and the EDs' total welfare can be improved significantly (e.g., by 120% and 50%, respectively) by using the proposed Crowd-MECS, comparing with the Non-MEC system where the CP serves all EDs directly.

Explore related subjects

cs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Changkun Jiang, Lin Gao, Tong Wang, Yufei Jiang, Jianqiang Li. 2020-03-10. Crowd-MECS: A Novel Crowdsourcing Framework for Mobile Edge Caching and Sharing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04481

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗