arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2002.11880

Stochastic Matching with Few Queries: $(1-\varepsilon)$ Approximation

Abstract

Suppose that we are given an arbitrary graph $G=(V, E)$ and know that each edge in $E$ is going to be realized independently with some probability $p$. The goal in the stochastic matching problem is to pick a sparse subgraph $Q$ of $G$ such that the realized edges in $Q$, in expectation, include a matching that is approximately as large as the maximum matching among the realized edges of $G$. The maximum degree of $Q$ can depend on $p$, but not on the size of $G$. This problem has been subject to extensive studies over the years and the approximation factor has been improved from $0.5$ to $0.5001$ to $0.6568$ and eventually to $2/3$. In this work, we analyze a natural sampling-based algorithm and show that it can obtain all the way up to $(1-\epsilon)$ approximation, for any constant $\epsilon > 0$. A key and of possible independent interest component of our analysis is an algorithm that constructs a matching on a stochastic graph, which among some other important properties, guarantees that each vertex is matched independently from the vertices that are sufficiently far. This allows us to bypass a previously known barrier towards achieving $(1-\epsilon)$ approximation based on existence of dense Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soheil Behnezhad, Mahsa Derakhshan, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi. 2020-02-27. Stochastic Matching with Few Queries: $(1-\varepsilon)$ Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11880

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS