arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2002.11124

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing

DES Collaboration·Tim Abbott·Michel Aguena·Alex Alarcon·Sahar Allam·Steve Allen·James Annis·Santiago Avila·David Bacon·Alberto Bermeo·Gary Bernstein·Emmanuel Bertin·Sunayana Bhargava·Sebastian Bocquet·David Brooks·Dillon Brout·Elizabeth Buckley-Geer·David Burke·Aurelio Carnero Rosell·Matias Carrasco Kind·Jorge Carretero·Francisco Javier Castander·Ross Cawthon·Chihway Chang·Xinyi Chen·Ami Choi·Matteo Costanzi·Martin Crocce·Luiz da Costa·Tamara Davis·Juan De Vicente·Joseph DeRose·Shantanu Desai·H. Thomas Diehl·Jörg Dietrich·Scott Dodelson·Peter Doel·Alex Drlica-Wagner·Kathleen Eckert·Tim Eifler·Jack Elvin-Poole·Juan Estrada·Spencer Everett·August Evrard·Arya Farahi·Ismael Ferrero·Brenna Flaugher·Pablo Fosalba·Josh Frieman·Juan Garcia-Bellido·Marco Gatti·Enrique Gaztanaga·David Gerdes·Tommaso Giannantonio·Paul Giles·Sebastian Grandis·Daniel Gruen·Robert Gruendl·Julia Gschwend·Gaston Gutierrez·Will Hartley·Samuel Hinton·Devon L. Hollowood·Klaus Honscheid·Ben Hoyle·Dragan Huterer·David James·Mike Jarvis·Tesla Jeltema·Margaret Johnson·Stephen Kent·Elisabeth Krause·Richard Kron·Kyler Kuehn·Nikolay Kuropatkin·Ofer Lahav·Ting Li·Christopher Lidman·Marcos Lima·Huan Lin·Niall MacCrann·Marcio Maia·Adam Mantz·Jennifer Marshall·Paul Martini·Julian Mayers·Peter Melchior·Juan Mena·Felipe Menanteau·Ramon Miquel·Joe Mohr·Robert Nichol·Brian Nord·Ricardo Ogando·Antonella Palmese·Francisco Paz-Chinchon·Andrés Plazas Malagón·Judit Prat·Markus Michael Rau·Kathy Romer

Abstract

We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for $S_8 =\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm 0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $\sigma_8-\Omega_{\rm m}$ posteriors in $2.4\sigma$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6\sigma$ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold ($\lambda \ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

DES Collaboration, Tim Abbott, Michel Aguena, Alex Alarcon, Sahar Allam, Steve Allen, James Annis, Santiago Avila, David Bacon, Alberto Bermeo, Gary Bernstein, Emmanuel Bertin, Sunayana Bhargava, Sebastian Bocquet, David Brooks, Dillon Brout, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer, David Burke, Aurelio Carnero Rosell, Matias Carrasco Kind, Jorge Carretero, Francisco Javier Castander, Ross Cawthon, Chihway Chang, Xinyi Chen, Ami Choi, Matteo Costanzi, Martin Crocce, Luiz da Costa, Tamara Davis, Juan De Vicente, Joseph DeRose, Shantanu Desai, H. Thomas Diehl, Jörg Dietrich, Scott Dodelson, Peter Doel, Alex Drlica-Wagner, Kathleen Eckert, Tim Eifler, Jack Elvin-Poole, Juan Estrada, Spencer Everett, August Evrard, Arya Farahi, Ismael Ferrero, Brenna Flaugher, Pablo Fosalba, Josh Frieman, Juan Garcia-Bellido, Marco Gatti, Enrique Gaztanaga, David Gerdes, Tommaso Giannantonio, Paul Giles, Sebastian Grandis, Daniel Gruen, Robert Gruendl, Julia Gschwend, Gaston Gutierrez, Will Hartley, Samuel Hinton, Devon L. Hollowood, Klaus Honscheid, Ben Hoyle, Dragan Huterer, David James, Mike Jarvis, Tesla Jeltema, Margaret Johnson, Stephen Kent, Elisabeth Krause, Richard Kron, Kyler Kuehn, Nikolay Kuropatkin, Ofer Lahav, Ting Li, Christopher Lidman, Marcos Lima, Huan Lin, Niall MacCrann, Marcio Maia, Adam Mantz, Jennifer Marshall, Paul Martini, Julian Mayers, Peter Melchior, Juan Mena, Felipe Menanteau, Ramon Miquel, Joe Mohr, Robert Nichol, Brian Nord, Ricardo Ogando, Antonella Palmese, Francisco Paz-Chinchon, Andrés Plazas Malagón, Judit Prat, Markus Michael Rau, Kathy Romer. 2020-02-25. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO