arXiv · 2002.09398
It's Not What Machines Can Learn, It's What We Cannot Teach
Abstract
Can deep neural networks learn to solve any task, and in particular problems of high complexity? This question attracts a lot of interest, with recent works tackling computationally hard tasks such as the traveling salesman problem and satisfiability. In this work we offer a different perspective on this question. Given the common assumption that $\textit{NP} \neq \textit{coNP}$ we prove that any polynomial-time sample generator for an $\textit{NP}$-hard problem samples, in fact, from an easier sub-problem. We empirically explore a case study, Conjunctive Query Containment, and show how common data generation techniques generate biased datasets that lead practitioners to over-estimate model accuracy. Our results suggest that machine learning approaches that require training on a dense uniform sampling from the target distribution cannot be used to solve computationally hard problems, the reason being the difficulty of generating sufficiently large and unbiased training sets.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Gal Yehuda, Moshe Gabel, Assaf Schuster. 2020-02-21. It's Not What Machines Can Learn, It's What We Cannot Teach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09398
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.