arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 2001.01289

Equivalences between Non-trivial Variants of 3LDT and Conv3LDT

Abstract

The popular 3SUM conjecture states that there is no strongly subquadratic time algorithm for checking if a given set of integers contains three distinct elements $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $x_1+x_2=x_3$. A closely related problem is to check if a given set of integers contains distinct elements satisfying $x_1+x_2=2x_3$. This can be reduced to 3SUM in almost-linear time, but surprisingly a reverse reduction establishing 3SUM hardness was not known. We provide such a reduction, thus resolving an open question of Erickson. In fact, we consider a more general problem called 3LDT parameterized by integer parameters $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3$ and $t$. In this problem, we need to check if a given set of integers contains distinct elements $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $\alpha_1 x_1+\alpha_2 x_2 +\alpha_3 x_3 = t$. We prove that all non-trivial variants of 3LDT over the same universe $[-n^c,n^c]$ for some $c\geq2$ are equivalent under subquadratic reductions. The main technical tool used in our proof is an application of the famous Behrend's construction that partitions a given set of integers into few subsets that avoid a chosen linear equation. We extend our results to Conv3LDT and show that for all $c\geq2$, all non-trivial variants of 3LDT over the universe $[-n^c,n^c]$ and of Conv3LDT over the universe $[-n^{c-1},n^{c-1}]$ are subquadratic-equivalent, so in particular they are all equivalent to 3SUM under subquadratic reductions. Finally, we show how to apply the methods of Fischer et al. to show that we can reduce non-trivial variant of 3LDT (Conv3LDT) over an arbitrary universe to the same variant over cubic (quadratic) universe.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bartłomiej Dudek, Paweł Gawrychowski, Tatiana Starikovskaya. 2020-01-05. Equivalences between Non-trivial Variants of 3LDT and Conv3LDT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01289

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS