arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1912.13370

Naturality of polyfold invariants and pulling back abstract perturbations

Wolfgang Schmaltz
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is possible to construct distinct polyfolds which model a given moduli space problem in subtly different ways. These distinct polyfolds yield invariants which, a priori, we cannot assume are equivalent. We provide a general framework for proving that polyfold invariants are natural, in the sense that under a mild hypothesis (the existence of an ``intermediary subbundle'' of a strong polyfold bundle) the polyfold invariants for such different models will be equal. As an application, we show that the polyfold Gromov-Witten invariants are independent of all choices made in the construction of the Gromov-Witten polyfolds. Furthermore, we show that the polyfold Gromov-Witten invariants are independent of the choice of exponential decay at the marked points. In addition, we consider the following problem. Given a map between polyfolds, we cannot naively consider the restriction of this map to the respective perturbed solution spaces. Under a mild topological hypothesis on the map, we show how to pullback abstract perturbations which then allows us to obtain a well-defined map between the perturbed solution spaces. As an application, we show that there exists a well-defined permutation map between the perturbed Gromov-Witten moduli spaces.

Explore related subjects

math.SG

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Wolfgang Schmaltz. 2019-12-31. Naturality of polyfold invariants and pulling back abstract perturbations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.13370

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Extended Future Tube Conjecture for Unipotent Subgroups

Let $\Omega$ be the Lorentz future cone in $\mathbb{R}^{d+1}$ with respect to the Lorentz product and let $T^M$ be the $M$-fold product of the future tube $T=\mathbb{R}^{d+1}+i\Omega$. The Lorentz group $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$ acts diagonally on $T^M$, and its complexification $\mathrm{SO}(1,d)^\mathbb{C}$ acts on $\mathbb{C}^{(d+1)\times M}$. We prove that the domain $G^\mathbb{C}\cdot T^M$ is a Stein manifold for any connected unipotent subgroup $G$ of $\mathrm{SO}_0(1,d)$.

math.SG↗
arXiv2026

The First Correction Term in the Asymptotic Expansion of Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian States

Let $\Lambda$ be a compact Bohr--Sommerfeld Lagrangian submanifold of a compact K\"ahler manifold equipped with a holomorphic prequantum line bundle. We study the asymptotic expansion of the Lagrangian states associated with $\Lambda$. In particular, we compute explicitly the first nontrivial correction term and show that it is expressed in terms of geometric invariants of the ambient K\"ahler manifold and the Lagrangian submanifold, including their scalar curvatures, the second fundamental form, and the mean curvature. As a consequence, we obtain the corresponding second-order asymptotic formula for the $L^2$-norm of the Lagrangian states.

math.SG↗
arXiv2026

Classification of Legendrian doubles and suspensions

We define a construction of Legendrians inside contact manifolds that arise by doubling an exact Lagrangian filling in the page of an open book decomposition. This can be seen as a generalization of a previous construction by Courte and Ekholm to arbitrary open books. These Legendrians, called Legendrian doubles, are shown to admit regular flexible exact Lagrangian fillings, and they are thus classified up to Legendrian isotopy by classical data. Finally, we show that the Legendrian suspension construction, as defined by Arikan and the author in previous work,-this is a Legendrian contained inside a page of an open book that is obtained by using Seidel's suspension of Lefschetz fibrations- is a Legendrian double.

math.SG↗