arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1911.03424

Approximation Bounds for Interpolation and Normals on Triangulated Surfaces and Manifolds

Abstract

How good is a triangulation as an approximation of a smooth curved surface or manifold? We provide bounds on the {\em interpolation error}, the error in the position of the surface, and the {\em normal error}, the error in the normal vectors of the surface, as approximated by a piecewise linearly triangulated surface whose vertices lie on the original, smooth surface. The interpolation error is the distance from an arbitrary point on the triangulation to the nearest point on the original, smooth manifold, or vice versa. The normal error is the angle separating the vector (or space) normal to a triangle from the vector (or space) normal to the smooth manifold (measured at a suitable point near the triangle). We also study the {\em normal variation}, the angle separating the normal vectors (or normal spaces) at two different points on a smooth manifold. Our bounds apply to manifolds of any dimension embedded in Euclidean spaces of any dimension, and our interpolation error bounds apply to simplices of any dimension, although our normal error bounds apply only to triangles. These bounds are expressed in terms of the sizes of suitable medial balls (the {\em empty ball size} or {\em local feature size} measured at certain points on the manifold), and have applications in Delaunay triangulation-based algorithms for provably good surface reconstruction and provably good mesh generation. Our bounds have better constants than the prior bounds we know of---and for several results in higher dimensions, our bounds are the first to give explicit constants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Marc Khoury, Jonathan Richard Shewchuk. 2019-11-08. Approximation Bounds for Interpolation and Normals on Triangulated Surfaces and Manifolds. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG