arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1910.01397

Group-like Uninorms

Sándor Jenei
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Uninorms play a prominent role both in the theory and the applications of Aggregations and Fuzzy Logic. In this paper the class of group-like uninorms is introduced and characterized. First, two variants of a general construction -- called partial-lexicographic product -- will be recalled from \cite{Jenei_Hahn}; these construct odd involutive FL$_e$-algebras. Then two particular ways of applying the partial-lexicographic product construction will be specified. The first method constructs, starting from $\mathbb R$ (the additive group of the reals) and modifying it in some way by $\mathbb Z$'s (the additive group of the integers), what we call basic group-like uninorms, whereas with the second method one can modify any group-like uninorm by a basic group-like uninorm to obtain another group-like uninorm. All group-like uninorms obtained this way have finitely many idempotent elements. On the other hand, we prove that given any group-like uninorm which has finitely many idempotent elements, it can be constructed by consecutive applications of the second construction (finitely many times) using only basic group-like uninorms as building blocks. Hence any basic group-like uninorm can be built using the first method, and any group-like uninorm which has finitely many idempotent elements can be built using the second method from only basic group-like uninorms. In this way a complete characterization for group-like uninorms which possess finitely many idempotent elements is given: ultimately, all such uninorms can be built from $\mathbb R$ and $\mathbb Z$. This characterization provides, for potential applications in several fields of fuzzy theory or aggregation theory, the whole spectrum of choice of those group-like uninorms which possess finitely many idempotent elements.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sándor Jenei. 2019-10-03. Group-like Uninorms. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01397

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗