Dynamic Approximate Shortest Paths and Beyond: Subquadratic and Worst-Case Update Time

Jan van den Brand; Danupon Nanongkai

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1909.10850

Dynamic Approximate Shortest Paths and Beyond: Subquadratic and Worst-Case Update Time

Jan van den Brand·Danupon Nanongkai

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Consider the following distance query for an $n$-node graph $G$ undergoing edge insertions and deletions: given two sets of nodes $I$ and $J$, return the distances between every pair of nodes in $I\times J$. This query is rather general and captures several versions of the dynamic shortest paths problem. In this paper, we develop an efficient $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for this query using fast matrix multiplication. Our algorithm leads to answers for some open problems for Single-Source and All-Pairs Shortest Paths (SSSP and APSP), as well as for Diameter, Radius, and Eccentricities. Below are some highlights. Note that all our algorithms guarantee worst-case update time and are randomized (Monte Carlo), but do not need the oblivious adversary assumption. Subquadratic update time for SSSP, Diameter, Centralities, ect.: When we want to maintain distances from a single node explicitly (without queries), a fundamental question is to beat trivially calling Dijkstra's static algorithm after each update, taking $\Theta(n^2)$ update time on dense graphs. It was known to be improbable for exact algorithms and for combinatorial any-approximation algorithms to polynomially beat the $\Omega(n^2)$ bound (under some conjectures) [Roditty, Zwick, ESA'04; Abboud, V. Williams, FOCS'14]. Our algorithm with $I=\{s\}$ and $J=V(G)$ implies a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation algorithm for this, guaranteeing $\tilde O(n^{1.823}/\epsilon^2)$ worst-case update time for directed graphs with positive real weights in $[1, W]$. With ideas from [Roditty, V. Williams, STOC'13], we also obtain the first subquadratic worst-case update time for $(5/3+\epsilon)$-approximating the eccentricities and $(1.5+\epsilon)$-approximating the diameter and radius for unweighted graphs (with small additive errors). [...]

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Jan van den Brand, Danupon Nanongkai. 2019-09-24. Dynamic Approximate Shortest Paths and Beyond: Subquadratic and Worst-Case Update Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10850

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗