Rural wireless deployments in India

Arpit Bajpai

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1909.08388

Rural wireless deployments in India

Arpit Bajpai

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Internet provides access to communications, information and opportunity to people. Growth of technology and its benefits should penetrate down to every citizen of a country. Rural Areas without Internet access risk being left behind in the information age. To be competitive, they must have broad and sustainable Internet services. Internet connectivity is especially important in developing countries like India where 67% of the population hail from rural areas. It is clear that most developing countries have still basic problems such as education, poverty, housing, and health, which are sure priorities for any government, it is important to determine whether an advanced informational infrastructure provides a tool for economic and social development. There are a lot of challenges that need to be considered while providing connectivity to rural areas such as high cost of installations, a dearth of skilled labor, deficiency of reliable power sources, local cooperation and support, etc. In this paper, we would like to discuss various dimensions and infrastructures in order to establish connectivity in the rural parts of India. We would also focus on the importance of maintenance of these wireless deployments and how it can be achieved.

Explore related subjects

cs.NI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Arpit Bajpai. 2019-09-04. Rural wireless deployments in India. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.08388

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Price of the Golden 6G Band: Evaluation of Beam Management Effort in FR3

Frequency Range 3 (FR3), 7.125-24.25 GHz, regarded as the "golden band" for 6G networks, has less challenging propagation characteristics than FR2 while offering much wider bandwidth for high data rate applications than FR1. Reusing existing FR1 infrastructure for FR3 network deployments requires gNodeBs (gNBs) to employ antenna arrays and perform beam management, which has proven challenging at FR2. In this paper, we extensively study and characterize the beam management effort in an FR3 urban network, in terms of: beam alignment sensitivity, number of directional link opportunities, gNB handover and beam switch rates, and beam steering distance. Our results show that achieving a high and stable mobile throughput requires significant beam management effort across FR3 bands. While the beam tracking requirements are less stringent at the lower frequencies due to wider beams, the beam switching rate to a non-adjacent beam is relatively comparable at FR3 and FR2.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2026

A Mechanical Antenna for Improving Capacity Fairness in Dynamic Multi-Station Scenarios

While indoor Internet of Things (IoT) and sensor networks increasingly rely on Wi-Fi access points (APs) to collect high-bandwidth data streams from multiple devices, conventional APs rely on static antenna deployments, whose fixed orientations are often suboptimal in dynamic propagation environments. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes a mechanical Wi-Fi antenna control system that adaptively optimizes its 3D antenna orientation for dynamic multi-station scenarios. The proposed system autonomously actuates its physical antennas in response to perceived radio environments by combining state-specific black-box optimizers and capacity-based environment change detection. The evaluation results show that the proposed system improves channel capacity under dynamic station combinations, avoids unnecessary re-optimization under transient blockages, and triggers re-optimization after sustained environmental changes such as continuous blockage and device relocation.

cs.NI↗

arXiv2026

Where Have All the Firewalls Gone? Security Consequences of Residential IPv6 Transition

IPv4 NAT has limited the spread of IoT botnets considerably by default-denying bots' incoming connection requests to in-home devices unless the owner has explicitly allowed them. As the Internet transitions to majority IPv6, however, residential connections no longer require the use of NAT. This paper therefore asks: has the transition from IPv4 to IPv6 ultimately made residential networks more vulnerable to attack, thereby empowering the next generation of IPv6-based IoT botnets? To answer this question, we introduce a large-scale IPv6 scanning methodology that, unlike those that rely on computationally intensive algorithms, can be run on low-resource devices common in IoT botnets. We use this methodology to perform the largest-scale measurement of IPv6 residential networks to date, and compare which devices are publicly accessible to comparable IPv4 networks. We received responses from 93,832,220 distinct IPv6 addresses, 14,901,892 of which are inside of residential networks (i.e., not the external-facing gateway IP). These residential network internal addresses span 4,412 ASes across 144 countries. These responses come from protocols commonly exploited by IoT botnets (including telnet and FTP), as well as protocols typically associated with end-user devices (including iPhone-Sync and IPP). Compared with IPv4, we reach 11x more HP printers over IPv6 than Shodan finds across the entire IPv4 Internet, and thousands of iPhones and smart lights whose services IPv4 NAT made unreachable by default. Collectively, our results show that NAT has indeed acted as the de facto firewall of the Internet, and the IPv4-to-IPv6 transition of residential networks is opening up new devices to attack. Finally, we discuss potential mitigations to prevent in-home network reachability as IPv6 adoption continues to grow.

cs.NI↗