arXiv · 1908.01660
Pseudo-finite sets, pseudo-o-minimality
Abstract
We give an example of two ordered structures M, N in the same language L with the same universe, the same order and admitting the same one-variable definable subsets such that M is a model of the common theory of o-minimal L-structures and N admits a definable, closed, bounded, and discrete subset and a definable injective self-mapping of that subset which is not surjective. This answers negatively two questions by Schoutens; the first being whether there is an axiomatization of the common theory of o-minimal structures in a given language by conditions on one-variable definable sets alone. The second being whether definable completeness and type completeness imply the pigeonhole principle. It also partially answers a question by Fornasiero asking whether definable completeness of an expansion of a real closed field implies the pigeonhole principle.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Nadav Meir. 2019-08-05. Pseudo-finite sets, pseudo-o-minimality. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2020.58
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.