arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1907.08754

Creating and experiencing Flipped Learning in Multivariable Calculus for Engineering

Abstract

This article discusses the process of creating, implementing and experiencing Flipped Learning in a Multivariable Calculus course for second year engineering students. We describe the construction of the teaching material, consisting of short videos for pre-class preparation and aligned worksheets for in-class dynamics, and the activities that were conducted. We discuss difficulties and key aspects to be considered while creating this material and during implementation of Flipped Learning. We present how students reacted to pre-class preparation and how in-class dynamics developed during implementation. We show results on students performance and perception when enrolling in a flipped classroom section. We present comparative results on students performance of a section taught with Flipped Learning vs a parallel section thought in the traditional expository way. We could conclude that flipped courses show similar results in passing percentage than traditionally taught courses, that student's perceptions are generally mixed, and we perceived that students repeating the course preferably do not choose flipped classes. Finally, we discussed the methodological evolution of this course converging to a mixed methodology throughout a four year period, observing that the instructors evaluation decreases in classes that were flipped. Mixed methodologies on the other hand, increased the learning experience of students resulting in an increased instructors evaluation score and higher students enrollment in the course.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hugo Caerols-Palma, Katia Vogt-Geisse. 2019-07-20. Creating and experiencing Flipped Learning in Multivariable Calculus for Engineering. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08754

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO