arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1907.07982

Sensitive Distance and Reachability Oracles for Large Batch Updates

Abstract

In the sensitive distance oracle problem, there are three phases. We first preprocess a given directed graph $G$ with $n$ nodes and integer weights from $[-W,W]$. Second, given a single batch of $f$ edge insertions and deletions, we update the data structure. Third, given a query pair of nodes $(u,v)$, return the distance from $u$ to $v$. In the easier problem called sensitive reachability oracle problem, we only ask if there exists a directed path from $u$ to $v$. Our first result is a sensitive distance oracle with $\tilde{O}(Wn^{\omega+(3-\omega)\mu})$ preprocessing time, $\tilde{O}(Wn^{2-\mu}f^{2}+Wnf^{\omega})$ update time, and $\tilde{O}(Wn^{2-\mu}f+Wnf^{2})$ query time where the parameter $\mu\in[0,1]$ can be chosen. The data-structure requires $O(Wn^{2+\mu} \log n)$ bits of memory. This is the first algorithm that can handle $f\ge\log n$ updates. Previous results (e.g. [Demetrescu et al. SICOMP'08; Bernstein and Karger SODA'08 and FOCS'09; Duan and Pettie SODA'09; Grandoni and Williams FOCS'12]) can handle at most 2 updates. When $3\le f\le\log n$, the only non-trivial algorithm was by [Weimann and Yuster FOCS'10]. When $W=\tilde{O}(1)$, our algorithm simultaneously improves their preprocessing time, update time, and query time. In particular, when $f=\omega(1)$, their update and query time is $\Omega(n^{2-o(1)})$, while our update and query time are truly subquadratic in $n$, i.e., ours is faster by a polynomial factor of $n$. To highlight the technique, ours is the first graph algorithm that exploits the kernel basis decomposition of polynomial matrices by [Jeannerod and Villard J.Comp'05; Zhou, Labahn and Storjohann J.Comp'15] developed in the symbolic computation community. [...]

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jan van den Brand, Thatchaphol Saranurak. 2019-07-18. Sensitive Distance and Reachability Oracles for Large Batch Updates. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07982

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS