arXiv · 1907.07321
Comparison of Neural Network Architectures for Spectrum Sensing
Abstract
Different neural network (NN) architectures have different advantages. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) achieved enormous success in computer vision, while recurrent neural networks (RNNs) gained popularity in speech recognition. It is not known which type of NN architecture is the best fit for classification of communication signals. In this work, we compare the behavior of fully-connected NN (FC), CNN, RNN, and bi-directional RNN (BiRNN) in a spectrum sensing task. The four NN architectures are compared on their detection performance, requirement of training data, computational complexity, and memory requirement. Given abundant training data and computational and memory resources, CNN, RNN, and BiRNN are shown to achieve similar performance. The performance of FC is worse than that of the other three types, except in the case where computational complexity is stringently limited.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Ziyu Ye, Andrew Gilman, Qihang Peng, Kelly Levick, Pamela Cosman, Larry Milstein. 2019-07-15. Comparison of Neural Network Architectures for Spectrum Sensing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07321
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.