arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1907.02120

Towards Improving Christofides Algorithm on Fundamental Classes by Gluing Convex Combinations of Tours

Arash Haddadan·Alantha Newman
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a new approach for gluing tours over certain tight, 3-edge cuts. Gluing over 3-edge cuts has been used in algorithms for finding Hamilton cycles in special graph classes and in proving bounds for 2-edge-connected subgraph problem, but not much was known in this direction for gluing connected multigraphs. We apply this approach to the traveling salesman problem (TSP) in the case when the objective function of the subtour elimination relaxation is minimized by a $\theta$-cyclic point: $x_e \in \{0,\theta, 1-\theta, 1\}$, where the support graph is subcubic and each vertex is incident to at least one edge with $x$-value 1. Such points are sufficient to resolve TSP in general. For these points, we construct a convex combination of tours in which we can reduce the usage of edges with $x$-value 1 from the $\frac{3}{2}$ of Christofides algorithm to $\frac{3}{2}-\frac{\theta}{10}$ while keeping the usage of edges with fractional $x$-value the same as Christofides algorithm. A direct consequence of this result is for the Uniform Cover Problem for TSP: In the case when the objective function of the subtour elimination relaxation is minimized by a $\frac{2}{3}$-uniform point: $x_e \in \{0, \frac{2}{3}\}$, we give a $\frac{17}{12}$-approximation algorithm for TSP. For such points, this lands us halfway between the approximation ratios of $\frac{3}{2}$ of Christofides algorithm and $\frac{4}{3}$ implied by the famous "four-thirds conjecture".

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arash Haddadan, Alantha Newman. 2019-07-03. Towards Improving Christofides Algorithm on Fundamental Classes by Gluing Convex Combinations of Tours. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02120

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗