arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1906.08874

Customer Segmentation of Wireless Trajectory Data

Matthew R Karlsen·Sotiris K. Moschoyiannis
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Wireless trajectory data consists of a number of (time, point) entries where each point is associated with a particular wireless device (WAP or BLE beacon) tied to a location identifier, such as a place name. A trajectory relates to a particular mobile device. Such data can be clustered `semantically' to identify similar trajectories, where similarity relates to non-geographic characteristics such as the type of location visited. Here we present a new approach to semantic trajectory clustering for such data. The approach is applicable to interpreting data that does not contain geographical coordinates, and thus contributes to the current literature on semantic trajectory clustering. The literature does not appear to provide such an approach, instead focusing on trajectory data where latitude and longitude data is available. We apply the techniques developed above in the context of the Onward Journey Planner Application, with the motivation of providing on-line recommendations for onward journey options in a context-specific manner. The trajectories analysed indicate commute patterns on the London Underground. Points are only recorded for communication with WAP and BLE beacons within the rail network. This context presents additional challenge since the trajectories are `truncated', with no true origin and destination details. In the above context we find that there are a range of travel patterns in the data, without the existence of distinct clusters. Suggestions are made concerning how to approach the problem of provision of on-line recommendations with such a data set. Thoughts concerning the related problem of prediction of journey route and destination are also provided.

Explore related subjects

cs.AIcs.DB

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matthew R Karlsen, Sotiris K. Moschoyiannis. 2019-06-20. Customer Segmentation of Wireless Trajectory Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI↗