arXiv · 1906.01336
Inflation model selection revisited
Abstract
We update the constraints on the power spectra of primordial curvature perturbation and tensor perturbation including Planck data 2015 (P15) and recently released BICEP2/Keck data (BK15), Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data and the Type Ia supernovae data. We find that the upper limits of tensor-to-scalar ratio are $0.061$, $0.064$ and $0.072$ at $95\%$ confidence level (CL) in the $Λ$CDM+$r$, $Λ$CDM+$r$+$α_s$ and $Λ$CDM+$r$+$α_s$+$β_s$ models respectively, where $α_s$ and $β_s$ are the running of scalar spectral index and running of running. The inflation model with a concave potential is favored at more than $95\%$ CL. In addition, parametrizing the slow-roll parameter $ε\sim 1/N^p$, where $N$ is the e-folding number before the end of inflation and taken in the range of $[50,60]$ and $[14,75]$ respectively, we conclude that the inflation model with a monomial potential $V(ϕ)\sim ϕ^n$ is disfavored at more than $95\%$ CL, and both the Starobinsky inflation model and brane inflation model are still consistent with the data.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jun Li, Qing-Guo Huang. 2019-06-04. Inflation model selection revisited. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-9446-1.
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.