arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1905.00850

Log Diameter Rounds Algorithms for $2$-Vertex and $2$-Edge Connectivity

Abstract

Many modern parallel systems, such as MapReduce, Hadoop and Spark, can be modeled well by the MPC model. The MPC model captures well coarse-grained computation on large data --- data is distributed to processors, each of which has a sublinear (in the input data) amount of memory and we alternate between rounds of computation and rounds of communication, where each machine can communicate an amount of data as large as the size of its memory. This model is stronger than the classical PRAM model, and it is an intriguing question to design algorithms whose running time is smaller than in the PRAM model. In this paper, we study two fundamental problems, $2$-edge connectivity and $2$-vertex connectivity (biconnectivity). PRAM algorithms which run in $O(\log n)$ time have been known for many years. We give algorithms using roughly log diameter rounds in the MPC model. Our main results are, for an $n$-vertex, $m$-edge graph of diameter $D$ and bi-diameter $D'$, 1) a $O(\log D\log\log_{m/n} n)$ parallel time $2$-edge connectivity algorithm, 2) a $O(\log D\log^2\log_{m/n}n+\log D'\log\log_{m/n}n)$ parallel time biconnectivity algorithm, where the bi-diameter $D'$ is the largest cycle length over all the vertex pairs in the same biconnected component. Our results are fully scalable, meaning that the memory per processor can be $O(n^{\delta})$ for arbitrary constant $\delta>0$, and the total memory used is linear in the problem size. Our $2$-edge connectivity algorithm achieves the same parallel time as the connectivity algorithm of Andoni et al. (FOCS 2018). We also show an $\Omega(\log D')$ conditional lower bound for the biconnectivity problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alexandr Andoni, Clifford Stein, Peilin Zhong. 2019-05-02. Log Diameter Rounds Algorithms for $2$-Vertex and $2$-Edge Connectivity. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00850

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS