Simpler and Better Algorithms for Minimum-Norm Load Balancing

Deeparnab Chakrabarty; Chaitanya Swamy

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1905.00044

Simpler and Better Algorithms for Minimum-Norm Load Balancing

Deeparnab Chakrabarty·Chaitanya Swamy

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Recently, Chakrabarty and Swamy (STOC 2019) introduced the {\em minimum-norm load-balancing} problem on unrelated machines, wherein we are given a set $J$ of jobs that need to be scheduled on a set of $m$ unrelated machines, and a monotone, symmetric norm; We seek an assignment $\sg:J\mapsto[m]$ that minimizes the norm of the resulting load vector $\lvec_\sg\in\R_+^m$, where $\lvec_\sg(i)$ is the load on machine $i$ under the assignment $\sg$. Besides capturing all $\ell_p$ norms, symmetric norms also capture other norms of interest including top-$\ell$ norms, and ordered norms. Chakrabarty and Swamy (STOC 2019) give a $(38+\ve)$-approximation algorithm for this problem via a general framework they develop for minimum-norm optimization that proceeds by first carefully reducing this problem (in a series of steps) to a problem called \minmax ordered load balancing, and then devising a so-called deterministic oblivious LP-rounding algorithm for ordered load balancing. We give a direct, and simple $4$-approximation algorithm for the minimum-norm load balancing based on rounding a (near-optimal) solution to a novel convex-programming relaxation for the problem. Whereas the natural convex program encoding minimum-norm load balancing problem has a large non-constant integrality gap, we show that this issue can be remedied by including a key constraint that bounds the "norm of the job-cost vector." Our techniques also yield a (essentially) $4$-approximation for: (a) {\em multi-norm load balancing}, wherein we are given multiple monotone symmetric norms, and we seek an assignment respecting a given budget for each norm; (b) the best {\em simultaneous approximation factor} achievable for all symmetric norms for a given instance.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Chaitanya Swamy. 2019-04-30. Simpler and Better Algorithms for Minimum-Norm Load Balancing. https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗