arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1904.02116

Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing from POLARBEAR and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam

Toshiya Namikawa·Yuji Chinone·Hironao Miyatake·Masamune Oguri·Ryuichi Takahashi·Akito Kusaka·Nobuhiko Katayama·Shunsuke Adachi·Mario Aguilar·Hiroaki Aihara·Aamir Ali·Robert Armstrong·Kam Arnold·Carlo Baccigalupi·Darcy Barron·Dominic Beck·Shawn Beckman·Federico Bianchini·David Boettger·Julian Borrill·Kolen Cheung·Lance Corbett·Kevin T. Crowley·Hamza El Bouhargani·Tucker Elleflot·Josquin Errard·Giulio Fabbian·Chang Feng·Nicholas Galitzki·Neil Goeckner-Wald·John Groh·Takaho Hamada·Masaya Hasegawa·Masashi Hazumi·Charles Hill·Logan Howe·Oliver Jeong·Daisuke Kaneko·Brian Keating·Adrian T. Lee·David Leon·Eric Linder·Lindsay Ng Lowry·Aashrita Mangu·Frederick Matsuda·Yuto Minami·Satoshi Miyazaki·Hitoshi Murayama·Martin Navaroli·Haruki Nishino·Atsushi J. Nishizawa·Anh Thi Phuong Pham·Davide Poletti·Giuseppe Puglisi·Christian L. Reichardt·Blake D. Sherwin·Maximiliano Silva-Feaver·Praween Siritanasak·Joshua S. Speagle·Radek Stompor·Aritoki Suzuki·Philip J. Tait·Osamu Tajima·Masahiro Takada·Satoru Takakura·Sayuri Takatori·Daiki Tanabe·Masayuki Tanaka·Grant P. Teply·Calvin Tsai·Clara Verges·Ben Westbrook·Yuyang Zhou·The POLARBEAR Collaboration·the Subaru HSC SSP Collaboration
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present the first measurement of cross-correlation between the lensing potential, reconstructed from cosmic microwave background (CMB) {\it polarization} data, and the cosmic shear field from galaxy shapes. This measurement is made using data from the POLARBEAR CMB experiment and the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. By analyzing an 11~deg$^2$ overlapping region, we reject the null hypothesis at 3.5$\sigma$\ and constrain the amplitude of the {\bf cross-spectrum} to $\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}=1.70\pm 0.48$, where $\widehat{A}_{\rm lens}$ is the amplitude normalized with respect to the Planck~2018{} prediction, based on the flat $\Lambda$ cold dark matter cosmology. The first measurement of this {\bf cross-spectrum} without relying on CMB temperature measurements is possible due to the deep POLARBEAR map with a noise level of ${\sim}$6\,$\mu$K-arcmin, as well as the deep HSC data with a high galaxy number density of $n_g=23\,{\rm arcmin^{-2}}$. We present a detailed study of the systematics budget to show that residual systematics in our results are negligibly small, which demonstrates the future potential of this cross-correlation technique.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Toshiya Namikawa, Yuji Chinone, Hironao Miyatake, Masamune Oguri, Ryuichi Takahashi, Akito Kusaka, Nobuhiko Katayama, Shunsuke Adachi, Mario Aguilar, Hiroaki Aihara, Aamir Ali, Robert Armstrong, Kam Arnold, Carlo Baccigalupi, Darcy Barron, Dominic Beck, Shawn Beckman, Federico Bianchini, David Boettger, Julian Borrill, Kolen Cheung, Lance Corbett, Kevin T. Crowley, Hamza El Bouhargani, Tucker Elleflot, Josquin Errard, Giulio Fabbian, Chang Feng, Nicholas Galitzki, Neil Goeckner-Wald, John Groh, Takaho Hamada, Masaya Hasegawa, Masashi Hazumi, Charles Hill, Logan Howe, Oliver Jeong, Daisuke Kaneko, Brian Keating, Adrian T. Lee, David Leon, Eric Linder, Lindsay Ng Lowry, Aashrita Mangu, Frederick Matsuda, Yuto Minami, Satoshi Miyazaki, Hitoshi Murayama, Martin Navaroli, Haruki Nishino, Atsushi J. Nishizawa, Anh Thi Phuong Pham, Davide Poletti, Giuseppe Puglisi, Christian L. Reichardt, Blake D. Sherwin, Maximiliano Silva-Feaver, Praween Siritanasak, Joshua S. Speagle, Radek Stompor, Aritoki Suzuki, Philip J. Tait, Osamu Tajima, Masahiro Takada, Satoru Takakura, Sayuri Takatori, Daiki Tanabe, Masayuki Tanaka, Grant P. Teply, Calvin Tsai, Clara Verges, Ben Westbrook, Yuyang Zhou, The POLARBEAR Collaboration, the Subaru HSC SSP Collaboration. 2019-04-03. Evidence for the Cross-correlation between Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Lensing from POLARBEAR and Cosmic Shear from Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3424

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗