arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1903.09208

Inflation and Dark Energy from spectroscopy at $z > 2$

Simone Ferraro·Michael J. Wilson·Muntazir Abidi·David Alonso·Behzad Ansarinejad·Robert Armstrong·Jacobo Asorey·Arturo Avelino·Carlo Baccigalupi·Kevin Bandura·Nicholas Battaglia·Chetan Bavdhankar·José Luis Bernal·Florian Beutler·Matteo Biagetti·Guillermo A. Blanc·Jonathan Blazek·Adam S. Bolton·Julian Borrill·Brenda Frye·Elizabeth Buckley-Geer·Philip Bull·Cliff Burgess·Christian T. Byrnes·Zheng Cai·Francisco J Castander·Emanuele Castorina·Tzu-Ching Chang·Jonás Chaves-Montero·Shi-Fan Chen·Xingang Chen·Christophe Balland·Christophe Yèche·J. D. Cohn·William Coulton·Helene Courtois·Rupert A. C. Croft·Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine·Guido D'Amico·Kyle Dawson·Jacques Delabrouille·Arjun Dey·Olivier Doré·Kelly A. Douglass·Duan Yutong·Cora Dvorkin·Alexander Eggemeier·Daniel Eisenstein·Xiaohui Fan·Pedro G. Ferreira·Andreu Font-Ribera·Simon Foreman·Juan García-Bellido·Martina Gerbino·Vera Gluscevic·Satya Gontcho A Gontcho·Daniel Green·Julien Guy·ChangHoon Hahn·Shaul Hanany·Will Handley·Nimish Hathi·Adam J. Hawken·César Hernández-Aguayo·Renée Hložek·Dragan Huterer·Mustapha Ishak·Marc Kamionkowski·Dionysios Karagiannis·Ryan E. Keeley·Robert Kehoe·Rishi Khatri·Alex Kim·Jean-Paul Kneib·Juna A. Kollmeier·Ely D. Kovetz·Elisabeth Krause·Alex Krolewski·Benjamin L'Huillier·Martin Landriau·Michael Levi·Michele Liguori·Eric Linder·Zarija Lukić·Axel de la Macorra·Andrés A. Plazas·Jennifer L. Marshall·Paul Martini·Kiyoshi Masui·Patrick McDonald·P. Daniel Meerburg·Joel Meyers·Mehrdad Mirbabayi·John Moustakas·Adam D. Myers·Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille·Laura Newburgh·Jeffrey A. Newman·Gustavo Niz·Hamsa Padmanabhan

Abstract

The expansion of the Universe is understood to have accelerated during two epochs: in its very first moments during a period of Inflation and much more recently, at $z < 1$, when Dark Energy is hypothesized to drive cosmic acceleration. The undiscovered mechanisms behind these two epochs represent some of the most important open problems in fundamental physics. The large cosmological volume at $2 < z < 5$, together with the ability to efficiently target high-$z$ galaxies with known techniques, enables large gains in the study of Inflation and Dark Energy. A future spectroscopic survey can test the Gaussianity of the initial conditions up to a factor of ~50 better than our current bounds, crossing the crucial theoretical threshold of $\sigma(f_{NL}^{\rm local})$ of order unity that separates single field and multi-field models. Simultaneously, it can measure the fraction of Dark Energy at the percent level up to $z = 5$, thus serving as an unprecedented test of the standard model and opening up a tremendous discovery space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Simone Ferraro, Michael J. Wilson, Muntazir Abidi, David Alonso, Behzad Ansarinejad, Robert Armstrong, Jacobo Asorey, Arturo Avelino, Carlo Baccigalupi, Kevin Bandura, Nicholas Battaglia, Chetan Bavdhankar, José Luis Bernal, Florian Beutler, Matteo Biagetti, Guillermo A. Blanc, Jonathan Blazek, Adam S. Bolton, Julian Borrill, Brenda Frye, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer, Philip Bull, Cliff Burgess, Christian T. Byrnes, Zheng Cai, Francisco J Castander, Emanuele Castorina, Tzu-Ching Chang, Jonás Chaves-Montero, Shi-Fan Chen, Xingang Chen, Christophe Balland, Christophe Yèche, J. D. Cohn, William Coulton, Helene Courtois, Rupert A. C. Croft, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Guido D'Amico, Kyle Dawson, Jacques Delabrouille, Arjun Dey, Olivier Doré, Kelly A. Douglass, Duan Yutong, Cora Dvorkin, Alexander Eggemeier, Daniel Eisenstein, Xiaohui Fan, Pedro G. Ferreira, Andreu Font-Ribera, Simon Foreman, Juan García-Bellido, Martina Gerbino, Vera Gluscevic, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, Daniel Green, Julien Guy, ChangHoon Hahn, Shaul Hanany, Will Handley, Nimish Hathi, Adam J. Hawken, César Hernández-Aguayo, Renée Hložek, Dragan Huterer, Mustapha Ishak, Marc Kamionkowski, Dionysios Karagiannis, Ryan E. Keeley, Robert Kehoe, Rishi Khatri, Alex Kim, Jean-Paul Kneib, Juna A. Kollmeier, Ely D. Kovetz, Elisabeth Krause, Alex Krolewski, Benjamin L'Huillier, Martin Landriau, Michael Levi, Michele Liguori, Eric Linder, Zarija Lukić, Axel de la Macorra, Andrés A. Plazas, Jennifer L. Marshall, Paul Martini, Kiyoshi Masui, Patrick McDonald, P. Daniel Meerburg, Joel Meyers, Mehrdad Mirbabayi, John Moustakas, Adam D. Myers, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Laura Newburgh, Jeffrey A. Newman, Gustavo Niz, Hamsa Padmanabhan. 2019-03-21. Inflation and Dark Energy from spectroscopy at $z > 2$. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09208

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO