Cost vs. Information Tradeoffs for Treasure Hunt in the Plane

Andrzej Pelc; Ram Narayan Yadav

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.06090

Cost vs. Information Tradeoffs for Treasure Hunt in the Plane

Andrzej Pelc·Ram Narayan Yadav

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A mobile agent has to find an inert treasure hidden in the plane. Both the agent and the treasure are modeled as points. This is a variant of the task known as treasure hunt. The treasure is at a distance at most $D$ from the initial position of the agent, and the agent finds the treasure when it gets at distance $r$ from it, called the {\em vision radius}. However, the agent does not know the location of the treasure and does not know the parameters $D$ and $r$. The cost of finding the treasure is the length of the trajectory of the agent. We investigate the tradeoffs between the amount of information held {\em a priori} by the agent and the cost of treasure hunt. Following the well-established paradigm of {\em algorithms with advice}, this information is given to the agent in advance as a binary string, by an oracle cooperating with the agent and knowing the location of the treasure and the initial position of the agent. The size of advice given to the agent is the length of this binary string. For any size $z$ of advice and any $D$ and $r$, let $OPT(z,D,r)$ be the optimal cost of finding the treasure for parameters $z$, $D$ and $r$, if the agent has only an advice string of length $z$ as input. We design treasure hunt algorithms working with advice of size $z$ at cost $O(OPT(z,D,r))$ whenever $r\leq 1$ or $r\geq 0.9D$. For intermediate values of $r$, i.e., $1 0$, the treasure can be found at cost $O(OPT(z,D,r)^{1+\alpha})$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Andrzej Pelc, Ram Narayan Yadav. 2019-02-16. Cost vs. Information Tradeoffs for Treasure Hunt in the Plane. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06090

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗