Parameter Estimation in Abruptly Changing Dynamic Environments

Hugo Lewi Hammer; Anis Yazidi

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1901.04678

Parameter Estimation in Abruptly Changing Dynamic Environments

Hugo Lewi Hammer·Anis Yazidi

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many real-life dynamical systems change abruptly followed by almost stationary periods. In this paper, we consider streams of data with such abrupt behavior and investigate the problem of tracking their statistical properties in an online manner. We devise a tracking procedure where an estimator that is suitable for a stationary environment is combined together with an event detection method such that the estimator rapidly can jump to a more suitable value if an event is detected. Combining an estimation procedure with detection procedure is commonly known idea in the literature. However, our contribution lies in building the detection procedure based on the difference between the stationary estimator and a Stochastic Learning Weak Estimator (SLWE). The SLWE estimator is known to be the state-of-the art approach to tracking properties of non-stationary environments and thus should be a better choice to detect changes in abruptly changing environments than the far more common sliding window based approaches. To the best of our knowledge, the event detection procedure suggested by Ross et al. (2012) is the only procedure in the literature taking advantage of the powerful tracking properties of the SLWE estimator. The procedure in Ross et al. is however quite complex and not well founded theoretically compared to the procedures in this paper. In this paper, we focus on estimation procedure for the binomial and multinomial distributions, but our approach can be easily generalized to cover other distributions as well. Extensive simulation results based on both synthetic and real-life data related to news classification demonstrate that our estimation procedure is easy to tune and performs well.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Hugo Lewi Hammer, Anis Yazidi. 2019-01-15. Parameter Estimation in Abruptly Changing Dynamic Environments. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04678

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗