arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1901.03816

Simple juntas for shifted families

Abstract

We say that a family $\mathcal F$ of $k$-element sets is a {\it $j$-junta} if there is a set $J$ of size $j$ such that, for any $F$, its presence in $\mathcal F$ depends on its intersection with $J$ only. Approximating arbitrary families by $j$-juntas with small $j$ is a recent powerful technique in extremal set theory. The weak point of all known junta approximation results is that they work in the range $n>Ck$, where $C$ is an extremely fast growing function of the input parameters, such as the quality of approximation or the number of families we simultaneously approximate. We say that a family $\mathcal F$ is {\it shifted} if for any $F=\{x_1,\ldots, x_k\}\in \mathcal F$ and any $G =\{y_1,\ldots, y_k\}$ such that $y_i\le x_i$, we have $G\in \mathcal F$. For many extremal set theory problems, including the Erd\H os Matching Conjecture, or the Complete $t$-Intersection Theorem, it is sufficient to deal with shifted families only. In this paper, we present very general approximation by juntas results for shifted families with explicit (and essentially linear) dependency on the input parameters. The results are best possible up to some constant factors. Moreover, they give meaningful statements for almost all range of values of $n$. The proofs are shorter than the proofs of the previous approximation by juntas results and are completely self-contained. As an application of our junta approximation, we give a nearly-linear bound for the multi-family version of the Erd\H os Matching Conjecture. More precisely, we prove the following result. Let $n\ge 12sk\log(e^2s)$ and suppose that the families $\mathcal F_1,\ldots, \mathcal F_s\subset {[n]\choose k}$ do not contain $F_1\in\mathcal F_1,\ldots, F_s\in \mathcal F_s$ such that $F_i$'s are pairwise disjoint. Then $\min_{i}|\mathcal F_i|\le {n\choose k}-{n-s+1\choose k}.$

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter Frankl, Andrey Kupavskii. 2020-09-03. Simple juntas for shifted families. https://doi.org/10.19086/da.14507

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO