arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1901.03596

Motion, fixation probability and the choice of an evolutionary process

Francisco Herrerías-Azcué·Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri·Tobias Galla
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Different evolutionary models are known to make disparate predictions for the success of an invading mutant in some situations. For example, some evolutionary mechanics lead to amplification of selection in structured populations, while others suppress it. Here, we use computer simulations to study evolutionary populations moved by flows, and show how the speed of this motion impacts the fixation probability of an invading mutant. Flows of different speeds interpolate between evolutionary dynamics on fixed heterogeneous graphs and in well-stirred populations. We find that the motion has an active role in amplifying or suppressing selection, accomplished by fragmenting and reconnecting the interaction graph. While increasing flow speeds suppress selection for most evolutionary models, we identify characteristic responses to flow for the different update rules we test. We suggest these responses as a potential aid for choosing the most suitable update rule for a given biological system.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Francisco Herrerías-Azcué, Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri, Tobias Galla. 2019-01-11. Motion, fixation probability and the choice of an evolutionary process. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007238

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Invading activity fronts or near-critical clusters may stabilize vulnerable excitable systems against stochastic trajectories terminating in an absorbing state

Stochastic chemical reaction or population dynamics in finite systems often terminates in an absorbing state. Yet in large spatially extended systems, the time to reach the absorbing configuration (e.g., species extinction or fixation) becomes exceedingly long. Tuning control parameters may effectively diminish the survival probability, rendering active states (species coexistence) susceptible to stochastic extinction events. In inhomogeneous settings, where a vulnerable subsystem is diffusively coupled to an adjacent stable patch, the former is re-activated through influx from the interfaces, provided the vulnerable region either sustains spreading activity fronts or near-critical large active clusters. Either dynamical structure resets the system to correlated initial conditions favorable for survival. We demonstrate this generic elimination of finite-size extinction instabilities via immigration flux in stochastic predator-prey, cyclic competition, and epidemic spreading models.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

Consensus-level substitution rates are distinct from the virion-level rate

Estimating viral substitution rates is central to evolutionary epidemiology, and recent interest in within-host evolution has sharpened the question of what such rates measure. I distinguish two classes of evolutionary rate estimand that are rarely separated in phylogenetic analysis: the virion-level substitution rate (VLSR), a molecular quantity counting mutational events along lineages, and consensus-level substitution rates (CLSRs), population-summary quantities counting allele frequency threshold crossings from below. CLSRs are indexed by the consensus-generation rule. The VLSR and CLSRs are both biologically meaningful, but not interchangeable. Because the consensus-generation rule defines a given CLSR, it should be reported routinely. This reflection should help analysts make more informed methodological choices when working with sets of virus sequences.

q-bio.PE↗
arXiv2026

The resource cost of cooperative invasion

A contact network can favor cooperation by sheltering a lineage until its descendants compete with defectors as a group. We determine the contact strengths, invasion times and measurement effort needed to realize this advantage at fixed population size. Individuals reproduce according to averaged cooperation payoffs, and offspring replace neighbors through contacts of equal weight in both directions. Contact contrast is the ratio of strongest to weakest contact. Under weak selection on a six-site path, the least contrast needed to favor a single cooperator over the reverse invasion by a defector grows as $656ε^{-2}$ for uniformly placed mutants and $4050ε^{-3}$ for mutations in newborn offspring, as the benefit-cost ratio $b/c=1+ε$ approaches one. The extra power arises because rare replacement protects a site while suppressing mutation arrival there. Global bounds force two weakly coupled groups and exact mirror symmetry of the least-contrast contacts for sufficiently small $ε$. Under uniform introduction, additional contrast shortens the leading mean time to extinction or fixation in the absence of selection, from $12/ε$ toward $6/ε$ reproduction attempts, and eventually breaks the mirror symmetry of the fastest design. Estimating the uniform-introduction advantage from fixation outcomes of independent completed invasions defines a third optimum. Within the six-site family with mirror-symmetric, strongly separated contacts, we optimize contacts and selection strength with reproduction weighted linearly or exponentially by payoff. At fixed relative precision, with contrast a fixed factor above its minimum, the leading summed trial duration grows as $ε^{-3}$. Efficient measurement accepts a smaller advantage in exchange for shorter trials. The cheapest, fastest and most efficiently measured networks therefore differ.

q-bio.PE↗