arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1812.01480

Ways of Destruction

Abstract

We study the following natural strong variant of destroying Borel ideals: $\mathbb{P}$ $\textit{$+$-destroys}$ $\mathcal{I}$ if $\mathbb{P}$ adds an $\mathcal{I}$-positive set which has finite intersection with every $A\in\mathcal{I}\cap V$. Also, we discuss the associated variants \begin{align*} \mathrm{non}^*(\mathcal{I},+)=&\min\big\{|\mathcal{Y}|:\mathcal{Y}\subseteq\mathcal{I}^+,\; \forall\;A\in\mathcal{I}\;\exists\;Y\in\mathcal{Y}\;|A\cap Y|<\omega\big\}\\ \mathrm{cov}^*(\mathcal{I},+)=&\min\big\{|\mathcal{C}|:\mathcal{C}\subseteq\mathcal{I},\; \forall\;Y\in\mathcal{I}^+\;\exists\;C\in\mathcal{C}\;|Y\cap C|=\omega\big\} \end{align*} of the star-uniformity and the star-covering numbers of these ideals. Among other results, (1) we give a simple combinatorial characterisation when a real forcing $\mathbb{P}_I$ can $+$-destroy a Borel ideal $\mathcal{J}$; (2) we discuss many classical examples of Borel ideals, their $+$-destructibility, and cardinal invariants; (3) we show that the Mathias-Prikry, $\mathbb{M}(\mathcal{I}^*)$-generic real $+$-destroys $\mathcal{I}$ iff $\mathbb{M}(\mathcal{I}^*)$ $+$-destroys $\mathcal{I}$ iff $\mathcal{I}$ can be $+$-destroyed iff $\mathrm{cov}^*(\mathcal{I},+)>\omega$; (4) we characterise when the Laver-Prikry, $\mathbb{L}(\mathcal{I}^*)$-generic real $+$-destroys $\mathcal{I}$, and in the case of P-ideals, when exactly $\mathbb{L}(\mathcal{I}^*)$ $+$-destroys $\mathcal{I}$; (5) we briefly discuss an even stronger form of destroying ideals closely related to the additivity of the null ideal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Barnabas Farkas, Lyubomyr Zdomskyy. 2018-12-04. Ways of Destruction. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01480

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO