Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Norm and Ordered Optimization Problems

Deeparnab Chakrabarty; Chaitanya Swamy

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1811.05022

Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Norm and Ordered Optimization Problems

Deeparnab Chakrabarty·Chaitanya Swamy

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

$ $In many optimization problems, a feasible solution induces a multi-dimensional cost vector. For example, in load-balancing a schedule induces a load vector across the machines. In $k$-clustering, opening $k$ facilities induces an assignment cost vector across the clients. In this paper we consider the following minimum norm optimization problem : Given an arbitrary monotone, symmetric norm, find a solution which minimizes the norm of the induced cost-vector. This generalizes many fundamental NP-hard problems. We give a general framework to tackle the minimum norm problem, and illustrate its efficacy in the unrelated machine load balancing and $k$-clustering setting. Our concrete results are the following. $\bullet$ We give constant factor approximation algorithms for the minimum norm load balancing problem in unrelated machines, and the minimum norm $k$-clustering problem. To our knowledge, our results constitute the first constant-factor approximations for such a general suite of objectives. $\bullet$ In load balancing with unrelated machines, we give a $2$-approximation for the problem of finding an assignment minimizing the sum of the largest $\ell$ loads, for any $\ell$. We give a $(2+\varepsilon)$-approximation for the so-called ordered load-balancing problem. $\bullet$ For $k$-clustering, we give a $(5+\varepsilon)$-approximation for the ordered $k$-median problem significantly improving the constant factor approximations from Byrka, Sornat, and Spoerhase (STOC 2018) and Chakrabarty and Swamy (ICALP 2018). $\bullet$ Our techniques also imply $O(1)$ approximations to the best simultaneous optimization factor for any instance of the unrelated machine load-balancing and the $k$-clustering setting. To our knowledge, these are the first positive simultaneous optimization results in these settings.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Deeparnab Chakrabarty, Chaitanya Swamy. 2018-11-12. Approximation Algorithms for Minimum Norm and Ordered Optimization Problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗