arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1811.02126

Recent progress in Rings and Subrings of Real Valued Measurable Functions

Abstract

Two separated realcompact measurable spaces $(X,\mathcal{A})$ and $(Y,\mathcal{B})$ are shown to be isomorphic if and only if the rings $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ and $\mathcal{M}(Y,\mathcal{B})$ of all real valued measurable functions over these two spaces are isomorphic. It is furthermore shown that any such ring $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$, even without the realcompactness hypothesis on $X$, can be embedded monomorphically in a ring of the form $C(K)$, where $K$ is a zero dimensional Hausdorff topological space. It is also shown that given a measure $\mu$ on $(X,\mathcal{A})$, the $m_\mu$-topology on $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ is 1st countable if and only if it is connected and this happens when and only when $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ becomes identical to the subring $L^\infty(\mu)$ of all $\mu$-essentially bounded measurable functions on $(X,\mathcal{A})$. Additionally, we investigate the ideal structures in subrings of $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ that consist of functions vanishing at all but finitely many points and functions 'vanishing at infinity' respectively. In particular, we show that the former subring equals the intersection of all free ideals in $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$ when $(X,\mathcal{A})$ is separated and $\mathcal{A}$ is infinite. Assuming $(X,\mathcal{A})$ is locally finite, we also determine a pair of necessary and sufficient conditions for the later subring to be an ideal of $\mathcal{M}(X,\mathcal{A})$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Soumyadip Acharyya, Sudip Kumar Acharyya, Sagarmoy Bag, Joshua Sack. 2018-11-06. Recent progress in Rings and Subrings of Real Valued Measurable Functions. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02126

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN