arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1810.07896

Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time

Michael B. Cohen·Yin Tat Lee·Zhao Song
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper shows how to solve linear programs of the form $\min_{Ax=b,x\geq0} c^\top x$ with $n$ variables in time $$O^*((n^ω+n^{2.5-α/2}+n^{2+1/6}) \log(n/δ))$$ where $ω$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication, $α$ is the dual exponent of matrix multiplication, and $δ$ is the relative accuracy. For the current value of $ω\sim2.37$ and $α\sim0.31$, our algorithm takes $O^*(n^ω \log(n/δ))$ time. When $ω= 2$, our algorithm takes $O^*(n^{2+1/6} \log(n/δ))$ time. Our algorithm utilizes several new concepts that we believe may be of independent interest: $\bullet$ We define a stochastic central path method. $\bullet$ We show how to maintain a projection matrix $\sqrt{W}A^{\top}(AWA^{\top})^{-1}A\sqrt{W}$ in sub-quadratic time under $\ell_{2}$ multiplicative changes in the diagonal matrix $W$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael B. Cohen, Yin Tat Lee, Zhao Song. 2020-10-20. Solving Linear Programs in the Current Matrix Multiplication Time. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07896

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗