arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1810.03165

How bacterial cells and colonies move on solid substrates

Abstract

Many bacteria rely on active cell appendages, such as type IV pili, to move over substrates and interact with neighboring cells. Here, we study the motion of individual cells and bacterial colonies, mediated by the collective interactions of multiple pili. It was shown experimentally that the substrate motility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae cells can be described as a persistent random walk with a persistence length that exceeds the mean pili length. Moreover, the persistence length increases for a higher number of pili per cell. With the help of a simple, tractable stochastic model, we test whether a tug-of-war without directional memory can explain the persistent motion of single Neisseria gonorrhoeae cells. While the persistent motion of single cells indeed emerges naturally in the model, a tug-of-war alone is not capable of explaining the motility of microcolonies, which becomes weaker with increasing colony size. We suggest sliding friction between the microcolonies and the substrate as the missing ingredient. While such friction almost does not affect the general mechanism of single cell motility, it has a strong effect on colony motility. We validate the theoretical predictions by using a three-dimensional computational model that includes explicit details of the pili dynamics, force generation and geometry of cells.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wolfram Pönisch, Christoph A. Weber, Vasily Zaburdaev. 2019-04-30. How bacterial cells and colonies move on solid substrates. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.99.042419

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Signature of mechanically induced cell extrusions in cell size distribution

How a growing tissue organizes its own homeostatic state is a central question in the physics of living matter. We show that when a growing epithelial sheet counteracts increasing cell density by mechanically squeezing cells out of its plane, a homeostatic in-plane pressure emerges as a generalization of a yield stress. We find that in the quasistatic growth limit the homeostatic state is marginally stable, with a pseudogap in the distribution of local distances to the extrusion threshold pressure. Because such mechanically induced extrusions arise from an instability of individual cells, the pseudogap is imprinted in the distribution of cell areas. This provides an image-based way to test for presence of mechanically induced extrusions and we identify this signature in the developing wing epithelium of \textit{D.~melanogaster}. We expect the same principles to apply to confined three-dimensional tissues.

physics.bio-ph

Fluidization in Growth-Induced Morphogenesis

Elastic buckling has explained shape formation in growing tissues, yet the role of tissue fluidity remains elusive. We derive a minimal fluidized growth-elasticity model as a nonlinear analogue of Maxwell rheology. Analysis of a growing strip reveals a different picture of growth-induced morphogenesis: rather than emerging at a critical stress, symmetry breaking develops continuously during growth. Fluidity regulates stress evolution, the rate of shape-symmetry breaking, and flow patterns, establishing it as an active regulator of morphogenesis beyond its intuitive role in stress relaxation.

physics.bio-ph

The Motile-Units model: Interacting spins model of cell polarization and motility

We introduce a coarse-grained interacting-spin model for two-dimensional cell motility, in which the cell perimeter is discretized into stochastic binary spins that switch between active and inactive states. Each perimeter spin represents a "motile-unit" that is a source of protrusive force and retrograde flow when active. Long-range interactions between the motile-units arise through a polarity cue advected by the collective actin retrograde flow, providing a minimal realization of spontaneous symmetry breaking and self-propulsion. The model exhibits three dynamical phases, a random walk phase, persistent random walk phase, and an intermittent bistable phase characterized by run-and-tumble migration. Additional nearest-neighbor interactions modulate speed and persistence without altering the overall phase structure. Owing to its simplicity, the framework naturally incorporates external cues, reproducing chemotactic migration, steering by localized optogenetic activation, and directional decision-making (symmetry breaking) under competing stimuli. The model introduces a new class of active-particle model in which both speed and polarity emerge from internal stochastic spin dynamics, rather than being imposed as particle-level variables, offering a framework for the study of cell migration and extends the scope of active-matter physics.

physics.bio-ph