arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1809.00393

On the Ja\'skowski Models for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

R. D. Arthan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 1936, Stanislaw Ja\'skowski gave a construction of an interesting sequence of what he called "matrices", which we would today call "finite Heyting Algebras". He then gave a very brief sketch of a proof that if a propositional formula holds in each of these algebras then it is provable in intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). The sketch just describes a certain normal form for propositional formulas and gives a very terse outline of an inductive argument showing that an unprovable formula in the normal form can be refuted in one of the algebras. Unfortunately, it is far from clear how to recover a complete proof from this sketch. In the early 1950s, Gene F. Rose gave a detailed proof of Ja\'skowski's result, still using the notion of matrix rather than Heyting algebra, based on a normal form that is more restrictive than the one that Ja\'skowski proposed. However, Rose's paper refers to his thesis for additional details, particularly concerning the normal form. This note gives a proof of Ja\'skowski's result using modern terminology and a normal form more like Ja\'skowski's. We also prove a semantic property of the normal form enabling us to give an alternative proof of completeness of IPL for the Heyting algebra semantics. We outline a decision procedure for IPL based on our proofs and illustrate it in action on some simple examples.

Explore related subjects

math.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

R. D. Arthan. 2018-09-02. On the Ja\'skowski Models for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO↗
arXiv2026

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO↗