arXiv · 1809.00022
Lim colim versus colim lim. II: Derived limits over a pospace
Abstract
\v{C}ech cohomology $H^n(X)$ of a separable metrizable space $X$ is defined in terms of cohomology of its nerves (or ANR neighborhoods) $P_\beta$ whereas Steenrod-Sitnikov homology $H_n(X)$ is defined in terms of homology of compact subsets $K_\alpha\subset X$. We show that one can also go vice versa: in a sense, $H^n(X)$ can be reconstructed from $H^n(K_\alpha)$, and if $X$ is finite dimensional, $H_n(X)$ can be reconstructed from $H_n(P_\beta)$. The reconstruction is via a Bousfield-Kan/Araki-Yoshimura type spectral sequence, except that the derived limits have to be "corrected" so as to take into account a natural topology on the indexing set. The corrected derived limits coincide with the usual ones when the topology is discrete, and in general are applied not to an inverse system but to a "partially ordered sheaf". The "correction" of the derived limit functors in turn involves constructing a "correct" (metrizable) topology on the order complex $|P|$ of a partially ordered metrizable space $P$ (such as the hyperspace $K(X)$ of nonempty compact subsets of $X$ with the Hausdorff metric). It turns out that three natural approaches (by using the space of measurable functions, the space of probability measures, or the usual embedding $K(X)\to C(X;\mathbb R)$) all lead to the same topology on $|P|$.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Sergey A. Melikhov. 2018-08-30. Lim colim versus colim lim. II: Derived limits over a pospace. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00022
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.