arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1808.08419

The Complexity of $(\Delta + 1)$Coloring inCongested Clique, Massively Parallel Computation,and Centralized Local Computation

Abstract

We present new randomized algorithms that improve the complexity of the classic $(\Delta+1)$-coloring problem, and its generalization $(\Delta+1)$-list-coloring, in three well-studied models of distributed, parallel, and centralized computation: Distributed Congested Clique: We present an $O(1)$-round randomized algorithm for $(\Delta+1)$-list coloring in the congested clique model of distributed computing. This settles the asymptotic complexity of this problem. It moreover improves upon the $O(\log^\ast \Delta)$-round randomized algorithms of Parter and Su [DISC'18] and $O((\log\log \Delta)\cdot \log^\ast \Delta)$-round randomized algorithm of Parter [ICALP'18]. Massively Parallel Computation: We present a $(\Delta+1)$-list coloring algorithm with round complexity $O(\sqrt{\log\log n})$ in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model with strongly sublinear memory per machine. This algorithm uses a memory of $O(n^{\alpha})$ per machine, for any desirable constant $\alpha>0$, and a total memory of $\widetilde{O}(m)$, where $m$ is the size of the graph. Notably, this is the first coloring algorithm with sublogarithmic round complexity, in the sublinear memory regime of MPC. For the quasilinear memory regime of MPC, an $O(1)$-round algorithm was given very recently by Assadi et al. [SODA'19]. Centralized Local Computation: We show that $(\Delta+1)$-list coloring can be solved with $\Delta^{O(1)} \cdot O(\log n)$ query complexity, in the centralized local computation model. The previous state-of-the-art for $(\Delta+1)$-list coloring in the centralized local computation model are based on simulation of known LOCAL algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yi-Jun Chang, Manuela Fischer, Mohsen Ghaffari, Jara Uitto, Yufan Zheng. 2018-08-25. The Complexity of $(\Delta + 1)$Coloring inCongested Clique, Massively Parallel Computation,and Centralized Local Computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.08419

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS