arXiv · 1807.10864
Corwin-Greenleaf multiplicity function for compact extensions of $\mathbb{R}^n$
Abstract
Let $G=K\ltimes\mathbb{R}^n$, where $K$ is a compact connected subgroup of $O(n)$ acting on $\mathbb{R}^n$ by rotations. Let $\mathfrak{g}\supset\mathfrak{k}$ be the respective Lie algebras of $G$ and $K$, and $pr: \mathfrak{g}^{*}\longrightarrow\mathfrak{k}^{*}$ the natural projection. For admissible coadjoint orbits $\mathcal{O}^{G}\subset\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ and $\mathcal{O}^{K}\subset\mathfrak{k}^{*}$, we denote by $n(\mathcal{O}^{G},\mathcal{O}^{K})$ the number of $K$-orbits in $\mathcal{O}^{G}\cap pr^{-1}(\mathcal{O}^{K})$, which is called the Corwin-Greenleaf multiplicity function. Let $π\in\widehat{G}$ and $τ\in\widehat{K}$ be the unitary representations corresponding, respectively, to $\mathcal{O}^G$ and $\mathcal{O}^K$ by the orbit method. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between $n(\mathcal{O}^G,\mathcal{O}^K)$ and the multiplicity $m(π,τ)$ of $τ$ in the restriction of $π$ to $K$. If $π$ is infinite-dimensional and the associated little group is connected, we show that $n(\mathcal{O}^G,\mathcal{O}^K)\neq 0$ if and only if $m(π,τ)\neq 0$. Furthermore, for $K=SO(n)$, $n\geq 3$, we give a sufficient condition on the representations $π$ and $τ$ in order that $n(\mathcal{O}^G,\mathcal{O}^K)=m(π,τ)$.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Majdi Ben Halima, Anis Messaoud. 2018-07-28. Corwin-Greenleaf multiplicity function for compact extensions of $\mathbb{R}^n$. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129167x15500846
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.