arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1807.09091

Revisiting the Challenges of MaxClique

Also available from

Abstract

The MaxClique problem, finding the largest complete subgraph in an Erd{\"o}s-R{\'e}nyi $G(N,p)$ random graph in the large $N$ limit, is a well-known example of a simple problem for which finding any approximate solution within a factor of $2$ of the known, probabilistically determined limit, appears to require P$=$NP. This type of search has practical importance in very large graphs. Algorithmic approaches run into phase boundaries long before they reach the size of the largest likely solutions. And, most intriguing, there is an extensive literature of \textit{challenges} posed for concrete methods of finding maximum naturally occurring as well as artificially hidden cliques, with computational costs that are at most polynomial in the size of the problem. We use the probabilistic approach in a novel way to provide a more insightful test of constructive algorithms for this problem. We show that extensions of existing methods of greedy local search will be able to meet the \textit{challenges} for practical problems of size $N$ as large as $10^{10}$ and perhaps more. Experiments with spectral methods that treat a single large clique of size $\alpha N^{1/2}$ \textit{planted} in the graph as an impurity level in a tight binding energy band show that such a clique can be detected when $\alpha \geq \approx1.0$. Belief propagation using a recent \textit{approximate message passing} (\textbf{AMP}) scheme of inference pushes this limit down to $\alpha \sim \sqrt{1/e}$. Exhaustive local search (with early stopping when the planted clique is found) does even better on problems of practical size, and proves to be the fastest solution method for this problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Raffaele Marino, Scott Kirkpatrick. 2018-07-24. Revisiting the Challenges of MaxClique. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30391-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS