arXiv · 1807.08675
$h^1\ne h_1$ for Anderson t-motives
Abstract
Let $M$ be an Anderson t-motive of dimension $n$ and rank $r$. Associated are two $\Bbb F_q[T]$-modules $H^1(M)$, $H_1(M)$ of dimensions $h^1(M)$, $h_1(M)\le r$ - analogs of $H^1(A,\Bbb Z)$, $H_1(A,\Bbb Z)$ for an abelian variety $A$. There is a theorem (Anderson): $h^1(M)=r \iff h_1(M)=r$; in this case $M$ is called uniformizable. It is natural to expect that always $h^1(M)=h_1(M)$. Nevertheless, we explicitly construct a counterexample. Further, we answer a question of D.Goss: is it possible that two Anderson t-motives that differ only by a nilpotent operator $N$ are of different uniformizability type, i.e. one of them is uniformizable and other not? We give an explicit example that this is possible.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Aleksandr Grishkov, Dmitry Logachev. 2018-07-23. $h^1\ne h_1$ for Anderson t-motives. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08675
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.