arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1807.07794

Kripke Semantics of the Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium

Ghislain Fourny
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium is algorithmically defined, for any game in normal form with perfect information and no ties, as the iterated deletion of non-individually-rational strategy profiles until at most one remains. In this paper, we characterize the Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium with adapted Kripke models having necessary rationality, necessary knowledge of strategies as well as eventual logical omniscience. Eventual logical omniscience is introduced as a weaker version of perfect logical omniscience, with logical omniscience being quantized and fading away counterfactually. It is the price to pay for necessary factual omniscience and necessary rationality: we conjecture that epistemic omniscience, logical omniscience and necessary rationality form an impossibility triangle. We consider multimodal classes of Kripke structures, with respect to agents, but also in the sense that we have both epistemic and logical accessibility relations. Knowledge is defined in terms of the former, while necessity is defined in terms of the latter. Lewisian closest-state functions, which are not restricted to unilateral deviations, model counterfactuals. We use impossible possible worlds \`a la Rantala to model that some strategy profiles cannot possibly be reached in some situations. Eventual logical omniscience is then bootstrapped with the agents' considering that, at logically possible, but non-normal worlds \`a la Kripke, any world is logically accessible and thus any deviation of strategy is possible. As in known in literature, under rationality and knowledge of strategies, these worlds characterize individual rationality. Then, in normal worlds, higher levels of logical omniscience characterize higher levels of individual rationality, and a high-enough level of logical omniscience characterizes, when it exists, the Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.LO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Ghislain Fourny. 2018-07-20. Kripke Semantics of the Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000277118

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗