Fast and Deterministic Approximations for $k$-Cut

Kent Quanrud

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1807.07143

Fast and Deterministic Approximations for $k$-Cut

Kent Quanrud

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In an undirected graph, a $k$-cut is a set of edges whose removal breaks the graph into at least $k$ connected components. The minimum weight $k$-cut can be computed in $O(n^{O(k)})$ time, but when $k$ is treated as part of the input, computing the minimum weight $k$-cut is NP-Hard [Holdschmidt and Hochbaum 1994]. For $\operatorname{poly}(m,n,k)$-time algorithms, the best possible approximation factor is essentially 2 under the small set expansion hypothesis [Manurangsi 2017]. Saran and Vazirani [1995] showed that a $(2 - 2/k)$-approximately minimum weight $k$-cut can be computed by $O(k)$ minimum cuts, which implies an $\tilde{O}(mk)$ randomized running time via the nearly linear time randomized min-cut algorithm of Karger [2000]. Nagamochi and Kamidoi [2007] showed that the minimum weight $k$-cut can be computed deterministically in $O(mn + n^2 \log n)$ time. These results prompt two basic questions. The first concerns the role of randomization. Is there a deterministic algorithm for 2-approximate $k$-cuts matching the randomized running time of $\tilde{O}(mk)$? The second question qualitatively compares minimum cut to 2-approximate minimum $k$-cut. Can 2-approximate $k$-cuts be computed as fast as the (exact) minimum cut - in $\tilde{O}(m)$ randomized time? We make progress on these questions with a deterministic approximation algorithm that computes $(2 + \epsilon)$-minimum $k$-cuts in $O(m \log^3(n) / \epsilon^2)$ time, via a $(1 + \epsilon)$-approximate for an LP relaxation of $k$-cut.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Kent Quanrud. 2018-07-18. Fast and Deterministic Approximations for $k$-Cut. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07143

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗