arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1807.06251

Sparsifying Distributed Algorithms with Ramifications in Massively Parallel Computation and Centralized Local Computation

Abstract

We introduce a method for sparsifying distributed algorithms and exhibit how it leads to improvements that go past known barriers in two algorithmic settings of large-scale graph processing: Massively Parallel Computation (MPC), and Local Computation Algorithms (LCA). - MPC with Strongly Sublinear Memory: Recently, there has been growing interest in obtaining MPC algorithms that are faster than their classic $O(\log n)$-round parallel counterparts for problems such as MIS, Maximal Matching, 2-Approximation of Minimum Vertex Cover, and $(1+\epsilon)$-Approximation of Maximum Matching. Currently, all such MPC algorithms require $\tilde{\Omega}(n)$ memory per machine. Czumaj et al. [STOC'18] were the first to handle $\tilde{\Omega}(n)$ memory, running in $O((\log\log n)^2)$ rounds. We obtain $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{\log \Delta})$-round MPC algorithms for all these four problems that work even when each machine has memory $n^{\alpha}$ for any constant $\alpha\in (0, 1)$. Here, $\Delta$ denotes the maximum degree. These are the first sublogarithmic-time algorithms for these problems that break the linear memory barrier. - LCAs with Query Complexity Below the Parnas-Ron Paradigm: Currently, the best known LCA for MIS has query complexity $\Delta^{O(\log \Delta)} poly(\log n)$, by Ghaffari [SODA'16]. As pointed out by Rubinfeld, obtaining a query complexity of $poly(\Delta\log n)$ remains a central open question. Ghaffari's bound almost reaches a $\Delta^{\Omega\left(\frac{\log \Delta}{\log\log \Delta}\right)}$ barrier common to all known MIS LCAs, which simulate distributed algorithms by learning the local topology, \`{a} la Parnas-Ron [TCS'07]. This barrier follows from the $\Omega(\frac{\log \Delta}{\log\log \Delta})$ distributed lower bound of Kuhn, et al. [JACM'16]. We break this barrier and obtain an MIS LCA with query complexity $\Delta^{O(\log\log \Delta)} poly(\log n)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mohsen Ghaffari, Jara Uitto. 2018-07-17. Sparsifying Distributed Algorithms with Ramifications in Massively Parallel Computation and Centralized Local Computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06251

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS