arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1807.00121

An optimal algorithm for 2-bounded delay buffer management with lookahead

Koji M. Kobayashi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The bounded delay buffer management problem, which was proposed by Kesselman et~al.\ (STOC 2001 and SIAM Journal on Computing 33(3), 2004), is an online problem focusing on buffer management of a switch supporting Quality of Service (QoS). The problem definition is as follows: Packets arrive to a buffer over time and each packet is specified by the {\em release time}, {\em deadline} and {\em value}. An algorithm can transmit at most one packet from the buffer at each integer time and can gain its value as the {\em profit} if transmitting a packet by its deadline after its release time. The objective of this problem is to maximize the gained profit. We say that an instance of the problem is $s$-bounded if for any packet, an algorithm has at most $s$ chances to transmit it. For any $s \geq 2$, Hajek (CISS 2001) showed that the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm is at least $(1 + \sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.619$. It is conjectured that there exists an algorithm whose competitive ratio matching this lower bound for any $s$. However, it has not been shown yet. Then, when $s = 2$, B{\"o}hm et al.~(ISAAC 2016) introduced the {\em lookahead} ability to an online algorithm, that is the algorithm can gain information about future arriving packets, and showed that the algorithm achieves the competitive ratio of $(-1 + \sqrt{13})/2 \approx 1.303$. Also, they showed that the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm is at least $(1 + \sqrt{17})/4 \approx 1.281$. In this paper, for the 2-bounded model with lookahead, we design an algorithm with a matching competitive ratio of $(1 + \sqrt{17})/4$.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Koji M. Kobayashi. 2018-06-30. An optimal algorithm for 2-bounded delay buffer management with lookahead. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00121

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗