arXiv · 1807.00071
GOTO Rankings Considered Helpful
Abstract
Rankings are a fact of life. Whether or not one likes them, they exist and are influential. Within academia, and in computer science in particular, rankings not only capture our attention but also widely influence people who have a limited understanding of computing science research, including prospective students, university administrators, and policy-makers. In short, rankings matter. This position paper advocates for the adoption of "GOTO rankings": rankings that use Good data, are Open, Transparent, and Objective, and the rejection of rankings that do not meet these criteria.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Emery Berger, Stephen M. Blackburn, Carla Brodley, H. V. Jagadish, Kathryn S. McKinley, Mario A. Nascimento, Minjeong Shin, Lexing Xie. 2018-06-29. GOTO Rankings Considered Helpful. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00071
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.