arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1806.06126

Tight Bound of Incremental Cover Trees for Dynamic Diversification

Hannah Marienwald·Wikor Pronobis·Klaus-Robert Müller·Shinichi Nakajima
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dynamic diversification---finding a set of data points with maximum diversity from a time-dependent sample pool---is an important task in recommender systems, web search, database search, and notification services, to avoid showing users duplicate or very similar items. The incremental cover tree (ICT) with high computational efficiency and flexibility has been applied to this task, and shown good performance. Specifically, it was empirically observed that ICT typically provides a set with its diversity only marginally ($\sim 1/ 1.2$ times) worse than the greedy max-min (GMM) algorithm, the state-of-the-art method for static diversification with its performance bound optimal for any polynomial time algorithm. Nevertheless, the known performance bound for ICT is 4 times worse than this optimal bound. With this paper, we aim to fill this very gap between theory and empirical observations. For achieving this, we first analyze variants of ICT methods, and derive tighter performance bounds. We then investigate the gap between the obtained bound and empirical observations by using specially designed artificial data for which the optimal diversity is known. Finally, we analyze the tightness of the bound, and show that the bound cannot be further improved, i.e., this paper provides the tightest possible bound for ICT methods. In addition, we demonstrate a new use of dynamic diversification for generative image samplers, where prototypes are incrementally collected from a stream of artificial images generated by an image sampler.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hannah Marienwald, Wikor Pronobis, Klaus-Robert Müller, Shinichi Nakajima. 2018-06-15. Tight Bound of Incremental Cover Trees for Dynamic Diversification. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06126

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗