arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1806.01905

A New Theoretical Evaluation Framework for Satisfaction Equilibria in Wireless Networks

Michail Fasoulakis·Eirini-Eleni Tsiropoulou·Symeon Papavassiliou
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper, a theoretical evaluation framework regarding the \textit{Satisfaction Equilibrium (SE)} in wireless communication networks is introduced and examined. To study these equilibria operation points, we coin some new concepts, namely the \textit{Valued Satisfaction Equilibrium}, the \textit{Price of Efficiency} and the \textit{Max Price of Satisfaction}, which can be used for measuring the efficiency of the obtained equilibria solutions. The aforementioned framework is analyzed and evaluated in a wireless communication environment under the presence of the Gaussian Interference channel (GIC). Within this setting, a non-cooperative game among the users is studied, where users aim in a selfish manner to meet their Quality of Service (QoS) prerequisite. However instead of maximizing the QoS which is generally energy costly, we evangelize that better energy-efficiency is achieved by targeting satisfactory QoS levels only. The sufficient and necessary conditions that lead to the \textit{Satisfaction Equilibrium} are provided for the two-user case and the \textit{Efficient Satisfaction Equilibrium (ESE)} is determined, where the users satisfy their QoS constraints with the lowest possible cost. Moreover, specific measures for evaluating the efficiency of various satisfaction equilibria, in a formal and quantitative manner, expressing the tradeoff with respect to the achieved utility or a given objective function and corresponding cost, are defined and analyzed.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.ITcs.NImath.IT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Michail Fasoulakis, Eirini-Eleni Tsiropoulou, Symeon Papavassiliou. 2018-06-05. A New Theoretical Evaluation Framework for Satisfaction Equilibria in Wireless Networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.01905

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT↗