Magnitude of selection bias in road safety epidemiology, a primer

Marine Dufournet

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1805.06399

Magnitude of selection bias in road safety epidemiology, a primer

Marine Dufournet

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In the field of road safety epidemiology, it is common to use responsibility analyses to assess the effect of a given factor on the risk of being responsible for an accident, among drivers involved in an accident only. Using the SCM framework, we formally showed in previous works that the causal odds-ratio of a given factor correlated with high speed cannot be unbiasedly estimated through responsibility analyses if inclusion into the dataset depends on the accident severity. The objective of this present work is to present numerical results to give a first quantification of the magnitude of the selection bias induced by responsibility analyses. We denote the binary variables by X the exposure of interest, V the high speed, F the driving fault, R the responsibility of a severe accident, A the severe accident, and W a set of categorical confounders. We illustrate the potential bias by comparing the causal effect of interest of X on R, COR(X,R|W=w), and the estimable odds-ratio available in responsibility analyses, OR(X,R|W=w, A=1). By considering a binary exposure, and by varying a set of parameters, we describe a situation where X could represent alcohol or cannabis intoxication. We confirm that the estimable odds-ratio available in responsibility analyses is a biased measure of the causal effect when X is correlated with high speed V and V is related to the accident severity A. In this case, the magnitude of the bias is all the more important that these two relationships are strong. When X is likely to increase the risk to drive fast V, the estimable odds-ratio underestimates the causal effect. When X is likely to decrease the risk to drive fast V, the estimable odds-ratio upperestimates the causal effect. The values of the different causal quantities considered here are from one to five times higher (or lower) than the estimable quantity available in responsability analyses.

Explore related subjects

stat.AP

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Marine Dufournet. 2018-05-16. Magnitude of selection bias in road safety epidemiology, a primer. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.06399

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy-Preserving Causal Meta-Mediation Analysis with Survival Outcomes

Privacy and data-governance constraints often prevent pooling individual-level data across studies, limiting the use of conventional approaches for causal media- tion analysis in multicenter settings. We propose a federated causal meta-mediation framework for right-censored time-to-event outcomes that enables collaborative es- timation without sharing individual-level data. Our framework targets natural indirect effects in a prespecified population by combining information on mediator and outcome mechanisms across distributed data sources. A site-by-site identifi- cation strategy further allows heterogeneity across data sources to be character- ized, with a variance decomposition separating outcome-related, mediator-related, and interaction components. We develop federated one-step and targeted maxi- mum likelihood estimators that accommodate data-adaptive and machine-learning methods for nuisance-function estimation. The finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators is evaluated through numerical simulations. To illustrate the practical utility of the framework, we apply it on data from the French National Health Data System to evaluate the role of methotrexate coprescription in explain- ing the effect of TNFi versus IL-12/23 inhibitor therapy on treatment persistence among psoriatic patients.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

Geospatial Foundation Models Capture Health-Relevant Dimensions of Place Beyond Conventional Social Risk Indices

Area-based social risk indices summarize residents' socioeconomic conditions but incompletely capture physical features of place that may affect health. We evaluated whether numerical representations of physical place produced by four geospatial foundation model families from 2022 satellite data explained residual variance in tract-level associations between the Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index with health outcomes. We used LightGBM to predict variables from the American Community Survey and 40 chronic disease and health-behavior outcomes from CDC PLACES across 82,646 census tracts in the contiguous United States, evaluating performance across 10 held-out states. Among survey variables, models were moderately predictive of some variables including housing type (R-squared up to 0.54) but weak for disability, unemployment, and income disparity. For health outcomes, models explained up to 54% of variance left unexplained by social risk indices, with the largest gains for annual checkups, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Mean total variance explained by geospatial foundation models across the 40 health-related outcomes increased from 0.31 in the smallest tract-size decile to 0.39 in the largest. Geospatial foundation models capture health-relevant features of place not represented by conventional social risk indices and may usefully augment them in epidemiological analyses.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

A spatiotemporal negative binomial model with dynamic dispersion: An application to Tuberculosis infections

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a critical public health concern in Brazil, characterized by pronounced spatial heterogeneity and fluctuating temporal volatility. In this paper, we study monthly TB notifications across 61 microregions of Sao Paulo state from 2001 to 2024. To do this, we introduce a negative binomial spatial integer-valued generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (INGARCH) model featuring jointly dynamic conditional means and time-varying dispersion. To capture inter-regional spillovers, we incorporate both discrete adjacency structures and a novel continuous distance-based formulation leveraging the Matern correlation function. Parameter estimation via conditional maximum likelihood employs a two-step profile-likelihood iterative scheme, demonstrating solid finite-sample performance in simulation studies. Applied to the Sao Paulo TB surveillance data, the framework substantially outperforms standard Poisson and fixed-dispersion spatiotemporal baselines in empirical fit and uncertainty quantification, maintaining nominal 95% predictive coverage across both dense metropolitan centers and rural microregions. Our results reveal marked spatial heterogeneity in baseline incidence, dynamic overdispersion driven by localized outbreaks, and short-range spatial interaction decay. By accurately modeling spatiotemporal volatility, the proposed methodology provides a robust statistical tool to support public health surveillance, policy-making, and resource allocation.

stat.AP↗