arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1805.03186

New methods to find patches of invisible integer lattice points

Abstract

It is a surprising fact that the proportion of integer lattice points visible from the origin is exactly $\frac{6}{π^2}$, or approximately 60 percent. Hence, approximately 40 percent of the integer lattice is hidden from the origin. Since 1971, many have studied a variety of problems involving lattice point visibility, in particular, searching for patterns in that 40 percent of the lattice comprised of invisible points. One such pattern is a square patch, an $n \times n$ grid of $n^2$ invisible points, which we call a hidden forest. It is known that there exist arbitrarily large hidden forests in the integer lattice. However, the methods up to now involve the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) on the rows and columns of matrices with prime number entries, and they have only been able to locate hidden forests very far from the origin. For example, using this method the closest known $4 \times 4$ hidden forest is over 3 quintillion, or $3 \times 10^{18}$, units away from the origin. We introduce the concept of quasiprime matrices and utilize a variety of computational and theoretical techniques to find some of the closest known hidden forests to this date. Using these new techniques, we find a $4 \times 4$ hidden forest that is merely 184 million units away from the origin. We conjecture that every hidden forest can be found via the CRT-algorithm on a quasiprime matrix.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Austin Goodrich, Aba Mbirika, Jasmine Nielsen. 2020-07-27. New methods to find patches of invisible integer lattice points. https://doi.org/10.2140/involve.2021.14.283

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT