arXiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1801.08646

Information Content of a Phylogenetic Tree in a Data Matrix

Tania Roy·Hsieh Fushing·Xunde Li·Brenda McCowan·Rob Atwill
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees in genetics and biology in general are all binary. We make an attempt to answer one fundamental question: Is such binary branching from the coarsest to the finest scales sustained by data? We convert this question into an equivalent one: where is the structural information of tree in a data matrix? Results from this conceptual as well as computing issue afford us to conclude a negative answer: Each branch being split into two at each inter-node of tree from the top to bottom levels is a man-made structure. The data-driven computing paradigm Data Mechanics is employed here to reveal that information of tree is composed of a set of selected temperatures (or scales), each of which has a clustering composition strictly regulated by a temperature-specific cluster-sharing probability matrix. The resultant Data Cloud Geometry (DCG) tree on the space of species is proposed as the authentic structure contained in data. Particularly each core clusters on the finest scale, the bottom level, of DCG tree should not be further partitioned because of uniformity. Beyond the finest scale, the branching of DCG tree is primarily based on probability, which induces an Ultrametric satisfying super triangular inequality property. This Ultrametric property differentiates DCG tree from all popular trees based on Hierarchical clustering (HC) algorithm, which typically employs an empirical, often ad hoc distance measure. Since this measure is regulated by the triangular inequality, it is not capable of producing a "flat" branch, in which all its members (more than two) have equal distances to each others. We demonstrate such information content on an illustrative zoo data first, and then on two genomic data.

Explore related subjects

stat.MEq-bio.PE

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Tania Roy, Hsieh Fushing, Xunde Li, Brenda McCowan, Rob Atwill. 2018-01-26. Information Content of a Phylogenetic Tree in a Data Matrix. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08646

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗