arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1712.09351

Time out of mind: Subben's checklist revisited: A partial description of the development of quantitative OR papers over a period of 25 years

Abstract

This short paper aims to investigate some of the historical developments of one classic, well-cited and highly esteemed scientific journal in the domain of quantitative operations research - namely the INFORMS journal Operations Research - over a period of 25 years between 1981 and 2006. As such this paper, and the journal in question, represents one representative attempt to analyze - for the purpose of possible future generalization - how research production has evolved, and evolves, over time. Among the general developments that we think we can trace are that (a) the historical overviews (i.e., literature surveys) in the articles, as well as the list of references, somewhat counter-intuitively shrink over time, while (b) the motivating and modelling parts grow. We also attempt to characterize - in some detail - the appearance and character, over time, of the most cited, as well as the least cited, papers over the years studied. In particular, we find that many of the least cited papers are quite imbalanced. For example, some of them include one main section only, and the least cited papers also have shorter reference lists. We also analyse the articles' utilization of important buzz words representing the constitutive parts of an OR journal paper, based on Subben's checklist (Larsson and Patriksson, 2014, 2016). Based on a word count of these buzz words we conclude through a citation study, utilizing a collection of particularly highly or little cited papers, that there is a quite strong positive correlation between a journal paper being highly cited and its degree of utilization of this checklist.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Torbjörn Larsson, Michael Patriksson, Johanna Pejlare. 2017-12-25. Time out of mind: Subben's checklist revisited: A partial description of the development of quantitative OR papers over a period of 25 years. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.09351

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Perspectives on the unit distance problem

This is a survey on an old open problem in combinatorics called the unit distance problem, and the field of mathematics around it, called incidence geometry. What do we know about the problem? Why is it difficult? How does it connect with other parts of math?

math.HO

A Categorical Approach to Euclidean Ratios and Proportions

A categorial approach to the non-metric geometry in Books V and VI of Euclid's \textit{Elements} is presented. Specifically, we introduce a diagrammatic syntax that can be overlaid immediately on his diagrams, thus bridging intuitive presentation with fidelity to Euclid's arguments. This syntax makes complicated definitions like V.5, and indeed the arguments throughout books V and VI, including arguments about similar figures, intuitively clear. We show in an appendix that this syntax can be used to solve a puzzle regarding ancient mathematics. Finally, we offer evidence that this approach to Euclidean diagrams is rooted in the Aristotelian tradition itself, and that a similar syntax was utilized, in antiquity, for related questions of numeric and proportions. Thus the syntax is plausibly faithful to Euclid's own thought-world, and not an outside-imposition.

math.HO

Some Early Results by Tutte Regarding the Cycle Double Cover Conjecture in 1948

OpenAI recently announced a proof of the Cycle Double Cover (CDC) Conjecture. Most media reports have characterized it as a 50-year-old open problem. In reality, according to a 1987 letter from Tutte to Fleischner, the Cycle Double Cover Problem has been open for at least 80 years. Two early results regarding the CDC conjecture were established in one of Tutte's 1949 publications.

math.HO