The Shrinkage Variance Hotelling $T^2$ Test for Genomic Profiling Studies

Grant Izmirlian

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1712.02845

The Shrinkage Variance Hotelling $T^2$ Test for Genomic Profiling Studies

Grant Izmirlian

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Designed gene expression micro-array experiments, consisting of several treatment levels with a number of replicates per level, are analyzed by applying simple tests for group differences at the per gene level. The gene level statistics are sorted and a criterion for selecting important genes which takes into account multiplicity is applied. A caveat arises in that true signals (genes truly over or under expressed) are "competing" with fairly large type I error signals. False positives near the top of a sorted list can occur when genes having very small fold-change are compensated by small enough variance to yield a large test statistic. One of the first attempts around this caveat as the development of "significance analysis of micro-arrays (SAM)", which used a modified t-type statistic thresholded against its permutation distribution. The key innovation of the modified t-statistic was the addition of a constant to the per gene standard errors in order to stabilize the coefficient of variation of the resulting test statistic. Since then, several authors have proposed the use of shrinkage variance estimators in conjunction with t-type, and more generally, ANOVA type tests at the gene level. Our new approach proposes the use of a shrinkage variance Hotelling T-squared statistic in which the per gene sample covariance matrix is replaced by a shrinkage estimate borrowing strength from across all genes. It is demonstrated that the new statistic retains the F-distribution under the null, with added degrees of freedom in the denominator. Advantages of this class of tests are (i) flexibility in that a whole family of hypothesis tests is possible (ii) the gains of the above-mentioned earlier innovations are enjoyed more fully. This paper summarizes our results and presents a simulation study benchmarking the new statistic against another recently proposed statistic.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Grant Izmirlian. 2017-12-07. The Shrinkage Variance Hotelling $T^2$ Test for Genomic Profiling Studies. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.02845

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME↗