arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1710.01788

Multitask Learning using Task Clustering with Applications to Predictive Modeling and GWAS of Plant Varieties

Abstract

Inferring predictive maps between multiple input and multiple output variables or tasks has innumerable applications in data science. Multi-task learning attempts to learn the maps to several output tasks simultaneously with information sharing between them. We propose a novel multi-task learning framework for sparse linear regression, where a full task hierarchy is automatically inferred from the data, with the assumption that the task parameters follow a hierarchical tree structure. The leaves of the tree are the parameters for individual tasks, and the root is the global model that approximates all the tasks. We apply the proposed approach to develop and evaluate: (a) predictive models of plant traits using large-scale and automated remote sensing data, and (b) GWAS methodologies mapping such derived phenotypes in lieu of hand-measured traits. We demonstrate the superior performance of our approach compared to other methods, as well as the usefulness of discovering hierarchical groupings between tasks. Our results suggest that richer genetic mapping can indeed be obtained from the remote sensing data. In addition, our discovered groupings reveal interesting insights from a plant science perspective.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ming Yu, Addie M. Thompson, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Eunho Yang, Aurélie C. Lozano. 2017-10-04. Multitask Learning using Task Clustering with Applications to Predictive Modeling and GWAS of Plant Varieties. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01788

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Neural Stochastic Differential Equations on Compact State Spaces: Theory, Methods, and Application to Suicide Risk Modeling

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies enable the collection of high-frequency self-reports of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) via smartphones. Latent stochastic differential equations (SDEs) are a promising model class for EMA data, as it is irregularly sampled, noisy, and partially observed. But SDE-based models suffer from two key limitations. (a) These models often violate domain constraints, undermining scientific validity and clinical trust of the model. (b) Training is numerically unstable without ad hoc fixes (e.g. oversimplified dynamics) that are ill-suited for high-stakes applications. Here, we develop a novel class of expressive SDEs whose solutions are provably confined to a prescribed compact polyhedral state space, matching the domains of EMA data. In this work, (1) we show why chain-rule based constructions of SDEs on compact domains fail, theoretically and empirically; (2) we derive constraints on drift and diffusion for general and stationary SDEs so their solutions remain in the desired state space; and (3), we introduce a parameterization that maps arbitrary (neural or expert-given) dynamics into constraint-satisfying SDEs. On several real EMA datasets, including a large suicide-risk study, our parameterization improves forecasts and optimization dynamics over standard latent neural SDE baselines. These contributions pave the way for principled, trustworthy continuous-time models of suicide risk and other clinical time series and extend applications of SDE-based methods (e.g. diffusion models) to domains with hard state constraints.

stat.ML

Nonnegative matrix factorizations and related compositional models: Equivalence, identifiability, and an application on the grain-size analysis of sediments

Across fields such as machine learning, social science, and geology, considerable attention has been given to models that factorize a nonnegative matrix into the product of two or three matrices, subject to nonnegative or row-sum-to-1 constraints. Although these models are to a large extent similar or even equivalent, they are presented under different names, and their similarity is not well known. This paper highlights similarities among five models, latent budget analysis (LBA) and latent class analysis (LCA) from social science, end-member analysis (EMA) from geology, probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA) and nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) from machine learning. We focus on the identifiability of these models. We prove that the solution of LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA is unique if and only if the solution of NMF is unique. Consequently, existing uniqueness theorems for NMF directly apply to LBA, EMA, LCA, PLSA, and vice versa. We also provide a brief review of algorithms for the estimation of these models. We illustrate NMF on a sedimentary grain-size distribution dataset from sedimentary geology, and end the paper with a discussion of closely related model: archetypal analysis.

stat.ML

CausalSmith: A Formally Grounded, Self-Improving Agentic Framework for Automated Research in Causal Inference

Automating theoretical research requires generating candidate results and evaluating them reliably. Models keep getting better at the first, while the second remains hard. A common approach asks one large language model (LLM) to review what another produced, yet such reviewers are empirically unreliable: they may accept fabricated papers and catch the fabrication at close to chance rates~\citep{badscientist2025}. We present \textsc{CausalSmith}, a framework for automated theoretical research in causal inference built on the Lean proof assistant, where a proof is checked by a program rather than read by a referee. \textsc{CausalSmith} rests on \textsc{Causalean}, a foundational Lean library for causal inference holding 8,179 machine-checked definitions and theorems, developed with language-model assistance under human design and review. Around it, we build a self-improving agentic pipeline that selects research topics, proposes results, formalizes statements, constructs proofs, and presents the resulting artifacts for human inspection. Moreover, the pipeline pairs Lean verification with a statement audit that compares each formal theorem against the informal claim behind it. We evaluate the system using artifacts produced by completed autonomous research runs. The source code, formal library, and run records are available at https://github.com/Jiyuan-Tan/CausalSmith.

stat.ML