arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv · 1708.03081

Distance-preserving Subgraphs of Interval Graphs

Abstract

We consider the problem of finding small distance-preserving subgraphs of undirected, unweighted interval graphs with $k$ terminal vertices. To start with, we show that finding an optimal distance-preserving subgraph is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard for general graphs. Then, we show that every interval graph admits a subgraph with $O(k)$ branching vertices that approximates pairwise terminal distances up to an additive term of $+1$. We also present an interval graph $G_{\mathrm{int}}$ for which the $+1$ approximation is necessary to obtain the $O(k)$ upper bound on the number of branching vertices. In particular, any distance-preserving subgraph of $G_{\mathrm{int}}$ has $\Omega(k\log k)$ branching vertices. Furthermore, we prove that every interval graph admits a distance-preserving subgraph with $O(k\log k)$ branching vertices, implying that the $\Omega(k\log k)$ lower bound for interval graphs is tight. To conclude, we show that there exists an interval graph such that every optimal distance-preserving subgraph of it has $O(k)$ branching vertices and $\Omega(k\log k)$ branching edges, thereby providing a separation between branching vertices and branching edges. The $O(k)$ bound for distance-approximating subgraphs follows from a na\"ive analysis of shortest paths in interval graphs. $G_{\mathrm{int}}$ is constructed using bit-reversal permutation matrices. The $O(k\log k)$ bound for distance-preserving subgraphs uses a divide-and-conquer approach. Finally, the separation between branching vertices and branching edges employs Hansel's lemma for graph covering.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kshitij Gajjar, Jaikumar Radhakrishnan. 2017-08-10. Distance-preserving Subgraphs of Interval Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03081

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS